User talk:Webclient101: Difference between revisions
Webclient101 (talk | contribs) m →?: fixing spaces |
→Triple Frontier: new section |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
the chuck norris chance was just a thing that people would look at and say chuck norris cool |
the chuck norris chance was just a thing that people would look at and say chuck norris cool |
||
== Triple Frontier == |
|||
My excuses. I am who I erase part of the article of the triple border. In spite of the fact that I am not registered I want to clarify that alone desire to improve and to expand the wikipedia. I want to clarify in that the flock on behalf of this article was not accidental and that leaves my reasons in the page discucion under the title terrorism. In spite of the fact that I believe that I hurry in erasing the section of the article I believe that it must be checked and corrected inside the context and an impartial form. Thank you very much and finally I want to say that I would like to support this project. |
Revision as of 03:37, 20 December 2012
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Webclient101. |
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
This is Webclient101's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. (I will respond on my talk page unless you specify otherwise.) Thank you. |
This is Webclient101's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Message from Mayerpoptart
- smc thinks im vandilizing your page tell him that im not andhow do you stop people from vandilising? sorry not that great of a speller.Mayerpoptart 03:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think your edit to my talk page was blatant vandalism. But was it necessary to say "hey this nagyman guy who is he i read what he said and what you said but you kinda lied", while I was trying to respond to your message? People usually fight vandalism using Huggle or another program that tracks vandalism that people recently add on Wikipedia. But I usually look through the recent changes or edit filter. Cheers, Webclient101talk 03:13, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
mayerpoptart03:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
im sorry i didnt mean to im kinda figity im sorry how do i deelete that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayerpoptart (talk • contribs) 03:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
qq — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.197.132.120 (talk) 07:51, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
IP Vandal
Hi Webclient101, your notice on User talk:2602:306:BC9B:F300:F5C7:413B:30AC:9EB2 was a level-3 warning even though it was the user's first warning. Could you replace it with a level-1 warning instead? Thanks, —Entropy (T/C) 02:37, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- Webclient101, I saw you moved around the notices on this user's talk page. The notice I posted (which was level-2) was in response to this edit to Evolve (professional wrestling). I noticed you subsequently added a level-4 notice regarding this earlier edit to Post-it note. From what I can tell the user ought to be only at warning level 2 because of the order and timing in which the notices were issued. —Entropy (T/C) 02:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Entropy, normally I don't add a level-3 warning on a users talk page. But this IP's vandalism was so blatant in bad faith that I felt the need to. I didn't move around the notice, I removed the notice that I added and then I added a level three notice because of this edit and then I added the last warning because of this edit and I reverted the rest of the user's 5 vandalistic contributions. Cheers, Webclient101talk 02:53, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Polysics edit.
Hello. You recently reverted an edit adding "Weeeeeeeeee!!!" to the list of Polysics albums. Cluebot did the same, too, so you're in good company. Odd as it may be, that really is the name of the album. Here's a link: [1] I restored it, with that link as a source, but thought you might want to know. Have a good one. Grayfell (talk) 10:48, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yikes. Thank you for catching that! See you around. (: -Webclient101talk 15:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
?
mayerpoptart03:16, 20 December 2012 (UTC)~
where you invited to the teahouse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayerpoptart (talk • contribs) 03:16, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
mayerpoptart03:30, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
the chuck norris chance was just a thing that people would look at and say chuck norris cool
Triple Frontier
My excuses. I am who I erase part of the article of the triple border. In spite of the fact that I am not registered I want to clarify that alone desire to improve and to expand the wikipedia. I want to clarify in that the flock on behalf of this article was not accidental and that leaves my reasons in the page discucion under the title terrorism. In spite of the fact that I believe that I hurry in erasing the section of the article I believe that it must be checked and corrected inside the context and an impartial form. Thank you very much and finally I want to say that I would like to support this project.