User talk:Centpacrr

While I always appreciate the thought, as a matter of personal policy I do not accept "Barnstars" or any other form of WP "merit badges"
on my User or Talk pages as giving or receiving such "awards" is not among the reasons I contribute to the project. ‡ 12.18.12 ‡

This editor is not an administrator and does not wish to be one.

POST NO AWARDSPlease post no "Barnstars" or other forms of WP merit badges as these are not why I contribute to Wikipedia.

NOTE: Before raising any issue of WP policy or guidelines here, please see here first.

Arbcom case

If you remember, I was involved in the Lenna image controversy, and I fully agree his behavior is toxic. I'm very focused on being just an editor, not a good Wikilawyer, but I will provide any support you suggest for detoxifying this guy. PAR (talk) 05:45, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, PAR. I agree fully with your views on WP ("being just an editor, not a good Wikilawyer") which are the same as mine. I try to avoid these controversies as much as possible. In the over six years I have been on WP this is the first RfA I have ever participated in, and I have only done so in this case because of the long history of disruptive practices, misuse of administrative tools and powers, and the personal attacks on myself and many other editors made by this Admin.

I think that the most helpful thing you can do is to post a statement as to your personal interactions with SchuminWeb at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#SchuminWeb to join those of the 18 other editors who have already done so since the RfA was opened yesterday. The vote of the Arbitrators who have commented so far is 7-0 to accept the case so your statement will not be wasted effort and will be fully considered in the desysop process. Centpacrr (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry, PAR, for (and puzzled by) the artificial controversy that Bwilkins seems to have made about your statement on the RfA and why he has used that to accuse me "tirades" and failure to assume good faith. I truly have no idea what he is talking about or what point he is trying to make. That being said, I thought your Statement was right on point, properly supported with a link, and hope you will post it again on the RfA. Centpacrr (talk) 19:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

• Please shorten your statement to 500 words or less. Your statement is currently way too long. For the Clerks --Lord Roem (talk) 04:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)