Talk:Youth Defence: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:33, 27 December 2012

This article and its editors are subject to Wikipedia general sanctions. Imposed by community discussion here.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Abortion Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Deleting references

Just reverted some edits that removed non-YD references. Editors should keep in mind that third party references are preferred, as self-published sources have limited use. Also claims made should have references. Autarch (talk) 02:47, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tidying

Just fixed a link - it was described as the official website, but was to a discussion on boards.ie.Autarch (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Looking at this page, it looks like krank.ie uses user-submitted content, making it more likely to fall under WP:SPS rather than WP:RS. Any thoughts? Autarch (talk) 23:40, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This source is totally biased against Youth Defence, I don't think it's a reliable source.85.240.22.108 (talk) 21:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Too Biased

Anyone can look at their Facebook page that the claims that they "censorship" people who aren't pro-life is untrue. I myself already entered several debates there with people who aren't pro-life. Its impossible to change people minds through censorship. The removal of "trolling" its not the same and its usual standard in Facebook. Take a look at their Facebook page: [1].85.240.22.108 (talk) 21:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 Looking at [http://www.krank.ie/get-involved-with-us/ this page], it looks like krank.ie uses user-submitted content, making it more likely to fall under [[WP:SPS]] rather than [[WP:RS]]. Any thoughts? [[User:Autarch|Autarch]] ([[User talk:Autarch|talk]]) 23:40, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
+This source is totally biased against Youth Defence, I don't think it's a reliable source.[[Special:Contributions/85.240.22.108|85.240.22.108]] ([[User talk:85.240.22.108|talk]]) 21:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
+== Too Biased ==
+Anyone can look at their Facebook page that the claims that they "censorship" people who aren't pro-life is untrue. I myself already entered several debates there with people who aren't pro-life. Its impossible to change people minds through censorship. The removal of "trolling" its not the same and its usual standard in Facebook. Take a look at their Facebook page: [https://www.facebook.com/YouthDefence].[[Special:Contributions/85.240.22.108|85.240.22.108]] ([[User talk:85.240.22.108|talk]]) 21:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)