Talk:Lorena Hickok/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: r |
→GA Review: GA pass |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*"cohabited" - lived with? - is there an extra meaning to "cohabited"? |
*"cohabited" - lived with? - is there an extra meaning to "cohabited"? |
||
::"Lived" is fine with me. -- [[User:Khazar2|Khazar2]] ([[User talk:Khazar2|talk]]) 22:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
::"Lived" is fine with me. -- [[User:Khazar2|Khazar2]] ([[User talk:Khazar2|talk]]) 22:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
Really, this is a wonderful article. I could criticize certain parts (e.g. [http://books.google.com/books?id=wQcMDdFC1QEC&pg=PA223&dq=Hick+isbn:9780684804484&hl=en&sa=X&ei=4hbiULCqCYT28gSt0IG4DQ&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Hick%20isbn%3A9780684804484&f=false Goodwin pages 223-224] seems to present a case that Eleanor was not homosexual, or primarily so) but I'm sure that discussion could go on and on. You have presented a concise summary of Hickok's life. Much appreciated! |
|||
'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review-see [[WP:WIAGA]] for criteria''' (and '''[[WP:GACN|here]]''' for what they are not) |
|||
#Is it '''reasonably well written'''? |
|||
#:a. prose: [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Clarity|clear and concise]], respects [[Wikipedia:COPYVIO|copyright laws]], correct spelling and grammar:{{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#:b. complies with [[Wikipedia:MoS|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|words to watch]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], [[Wikipedia:Summary style|summary style]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (embedded lists)|list incorporation]]: {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#Is it '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''? |
|||
#:a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|guide to layout]]: {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#:b. provides [[Wikipedia:Inline citation|in-line citations]] from [[Wikipedia:RS|reliable sources]] where necessary: {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#:c. [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research]]: {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#Is it '''broad in its coverage'''? |
|||
#:a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic: {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#:b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see [[Wikipedia:Summary style|summary style]]): {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#Does it follow the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''. |
|||
#:fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#Is it '''stable'''? |
|||
#: no [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit wars]], etc: {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#Does it '''contain [[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' to illustrate the topic? |
|||
#:a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]]: {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#:b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]]: {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#'''Overall''': |
|||
#:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|y}} |
|||
#:: Pass! |
|||
#:: <!-- Template:GAList --> |
|||
Great job! [[User:MathewTownsend|MathewTownsend]] ([[User talk:MathewTownsend|talk]]) 23:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:33, 31 December 2012
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 19:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Open review. Will start soon! Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 19:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
(beginning)
- "playing with the farm's animals" - what farm?
- Her father was a buttermaker; clarified.
- two adjacent blue links: diva Ernestine Schumann-Heink - is there a way to separate them?
- I've simply delinked diva.
- "cohabited" - lived with? - is there an extra meaning to "cohabited"?
Really, this is a wonderful article. I could criticize certain parts (e.g. Goodwin pages 223-224 seems to present a case that Eleanor was not homosexual, or primarily so) but I'm sure that discussion could go on and on. You have presented a concise summary of Hickok's life. Much appreciated!
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, summary style and list incorporation:
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
- c. no original research:
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- fair representation without bias:
- fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- no edit wars, etc:
- no edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass!
- Pass or Fail:
Great job! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)