Talk:Skyglobe: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '==Great work== DOS programmes were written entirely in assembler! All due respect to SkyGlobe's original programmers. Programming efforts aside, great scientific...' |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
DOS programmes were written entirely in assembler! |
DOS programmes were written entirely in assembler! |
||
All due respect to SkyGlobe's original programmers. Programming efforts aside, great scientific contributions. [[Special:Contributions/115.64.144.135|115.64.144.135]] ([[User talk:115.64.144.135|talk]]) 08:32, 23 December 2012 (UTC) |
All due respect to SkyGlobe's original programmers. Programming efforts aside, great scientific contributions. [[Special:Contributions/115.64.144.135|115.64.144.135]] ([[User talk:115.64.144.135|talk]]) 08:32, 23 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
:The Windows verison of skyglobe looks & feels very differently from the original DOS versions. An overcast of C++ over the original, it seems. Pity that the original DOS versions would no longer run under Windows7 or later (Still running under XP though). Someone falling out on the job very badly there @MicrosoftCorporation! [[Special:Contributions/14.201.95.31|14.201.95.31]] ([[User talk:14.201.95.31|talk]]) 09:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:43, 11 January 2013
Great work
DOS programmes were written entirely in assembler! All due respect to SkyGlobe's original programmers. Programming efforts aside, great scientific contributions. 115.64.144.135 (talk) 08:32, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- The Windows verison of skyglobe looks & feels very differently from the original DOS versions. An overcast of C++ over the original, it seems. Pity that the original DOS versions would no longer run under Windows7 or later (Still running under XP though). Someone falling out on the job very badly there @MicrosoftCorporation! 14.201.95.31 (talk) 09:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)