Strong objectivity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Strong objectivity''' is a term first used by standpoint feminist [[Sandra Harding]] to describe research that starts from the experiences of those who have traditionally been left out of the production of knowledge. Harding suggests that starting research from the lives of women "actually strengthens standards of objectivity".<ref> Tickner, J Ann (1997) ''You Just Don't Understand: Troubled: Enagements between Feminists and IR Theorists'', International Studies Quartlery, 41/4: 622</ref> Strong objectivity can be contrasted with the supposed 'weak objectivity' of supposed value-neutral research <ref>Ritzer, George (ed). Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Blackwell Publishing, 2007. Blackwell Reference Online. 08 January 2011 <http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/book?id=g9781405124331_yr2010_9781405124331</ref>'' |
'''Strong objectivity''' is a term first used by standpoint feminist [[Sandra Harding]] to describe research that starts from the experiences of those who have traditionally been left out of the production of knowledge. Harding suggests that starting research from the lives of women "actually strengthens standards of objectivity".<ref> Tickner, J Ann (1997) ''You Just Don't Understand: Troubled: Enagements between Feminists and IR Theorists'', International Studies Quartlery, 41/4: 622</ref> Strong objectivity can be contrasted with the supposed 'weak objectivity' of supposed value-neutral research <ref>Ritzer, George (ed). Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Blackwell Publishing, 2007. Blackwell Reference Online. 08 January 2011 <http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/book?id=g9781405124331_yr2010_9781405124331</ref>'' |
||
From a feminist standpoint, the question of objectivity stems from what kinds of knowledge projects are objective and which aren't, and why; whether or not objectivity is necessary; and how |
From a feminist standpoint, the question of objectivity stems from what kinds of knowledge projects are objective and which aren't, and why; whether or not objectivity is necessary; and how, or if, it is possible to achieve objectivity. These considerations arise at least in part from concerns about sexism and androcentric bias in dominant scientific life and studies. |
||
Standpoint epistemologies require stronger standards for objectivity in the analysis of knowledge. The conventional standard of objectivity is considered too weak to act as a tool for feminism and other social movements. The subject of knowledge must therefore be considered an object of knowledge from the perspective of scientific method. Knowledge and the biases affecting it must be equally judged by the scientific community and located in social history. <ref>Harding, Sandra. "Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is "Strong Objectivity?" Feminist Theory: A Philosophical Anthology. Ed. Cudd, Ann E. and Robin O. Andreasen, 2005. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.</ref> |
Standpoint epistemologies require stronger standards for objectivity in the analysis of knowledge. The conventional standard of objectivity is considered too weak to act as a tool for feminism and other social movements. The subject of knowledge must therefore be considered an object of knowledge from the perspective of scientific method. Knowledge and the biases affecting it must be equally judged by the scientific community and located in social history. <ref>Harding, Sandra. "Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is "Strong Objectivity?" Feminist Theory: A Philosophical Anthology. Ed. Cudd, Ann E. and Robin O. Andreasen, 2005. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.</ref> |
||
Revision as of 19:08, 28 February 2013
Strong objectivity is a term first used by standpoint feminist Sandra Harding to describe research that starts from the experiences of those who have traditionally been left out of the production of knowledge. Harding suggests that starting research from the lives of women "actually strengthens standards of objectivity".[1] Strong objectivity can be contrasted with the supposed 'weak objectivity' of supposed value-neutral research [2]
From a feminist standpoint, the question of objectivity stems from what kinds of knowledge projects are objective and which aren't, and why; whether or not objectivity is necessary; and how, or if, it is possible to achieve objectivity. These considerations arise at least in part from concerns about sexism and androcentric bias in dominant scientific life and studies.
Standpoint epistemologies require stronger standards for objectivity in the analysis of knowledge. The conventional standard of objectivity is considered too weak to act as a tool for feminism and other social movements. The subject of knowledge must therefore be considered an object of knowledge from the perspective of scientific method. Knowledge and the biases affecting it must be equally judged by the scientific community and located in social history. [3]
See also
Further reading
- Harding, Sandra (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
References
- ^ Tickner, J Ann (1997) You Just Don't Understand: Troubled: Enagements between Feminists and IR Theorists, International Studies Quartlery, 41/4: 622
- ^ Ritzer, George (ed). Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Blackwell Publishing, 2007. Blackwell Reference Online. 08 January 2011 <http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/book?id=g9781405124331_yr2010_9781405124331
- ^ Harding, Sandra. "Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is "Strong Objectivity?" Feminist Theory: A Philosophical Anthology. Ed. Cudd, Ann E. and Robin O. Andreasen, 2005. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
 | This feminism-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |