User talk:Camyoung54: Difference between revisions
Camyoung54 (talk | contribs) |
→Amazon.com: new section |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Hey there. First of all, thank you for your work with [[WP:SPER]]. However, when you answer a request asking for clarification or sources, could you change <code>answered=no</code> to <code>yes</code> in the {{tl|Edit semi-protected}} template? Doing so saves other editors the trouble of looking at requests that have already been answered, and that can't be carried out anyway without further input from the original requester. Thanks. — [[User:Daranz|daranz]] [ [[User talk:Daranz|t]] ] 07:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC) |
Hey there. First of all, thank you for your work with [[WP:SPER]]. However, when you answer a request asking for clarification or sources, could you change <code>answered=no</code> to <code>yes</code> in the {{tl|Edit semi-protected}} template? Doing so saves other editors the trouble of looking at requests that have already been answered, and that can't be carried out anyway without further input from the original requester. Thanks. — [[User:Daranz|daranz]] [ [[User talk:Daranz|t]] ] 07:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Yes, I will going forward. Thanks, [[User:Camyoung54|<font color="green">Camyoung54</font>]] [[User talk:Camyoung54|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]] 20:17, 26 February 2013 (UTC) |
:Yes, I will going forward. Thanks, [[User:Camyoung54|<font color="green">Camyoung54</font>]] [[User talk:Camyoung54|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]] 20:17, 26 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Amazon.com == |
|||
Amazon.com is a reliable source and is used on SEVERAL PAGES through out Wikipedia. You cannot call it unreliable if it is used on several pages. [[Special:Contributions/184.58.22.86|184.58.22.86]] ([[User talk:184.58.22.86|talk]]) 11:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:58, 1 March 2013
| This is Camyoung54's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
I just wanted to make you aware of this discussion I started at Winter storm naming. I have no intentions of making any changes to the article myself, but was just hoping to get input from editors previously involved in the article (or recently-closed AfD) in an effort to improve the article and clarify its purpose. I will leave any changes to the consensus of other editors who decide what's best. Your participation would be welcome, regardless of your views on the issue. Thank you. 76.189.111.199 (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Rabbit
Hello, I'm not sure if you regularly contribute to the article Rabbit or if you just came across it on a check of CAT:ESP (I assume from your edit history it's the latter, same as me). I was in the middle of declining the edit request that you incorporated, not because I disagreed with the request, but because the entire section was a copyright infringement. See my comment at Talk:Rabbit and let me know if you agree. I think that section needs to be rewritten ASAP as it contained really good information if not for the fact that it was copy-pasted. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:17, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. I only accepted the edit request because the numbers didn't make sense to me, however made more sense with the edit that was requested. I had no idea the section was a copyright infringement and definitely agree it needs to be rewritten since it is so similar to the page you mentioned on Talk:Rabbit. Camyoung54 talk 15:22, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Answering SP edit requests
Hey there. First of all, thank you for your work with WP:SPER. However, when you answer a request asking for clarification or sources, could you change answered=no to yes in the {{Edit semi-protected}} template? Doing so saves other editors the trouble of looking at requests that have already been answered, and that can't be carried out anyway without further input from the original requester. Thanks. — daranz [ t ] 07:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I will going forward. Thanks, Camyoung54 talk 20:17, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Amazon.com
Amazon.com is a reliable source and is used on SEVERAL PAGES through out Wikipedia. You cannot call it unreliable if it is used on several pages. 184.58.22.86 (talk) 11:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)