User talk:Barek

Barek is tired of wikidrama, and has chosen to spend more time in the real world; but may still wander back online occasionally. During this time, replies to queries may be greatly delayed.

Please click here to start a new message at the bottom of this page.
	If you post a message to me here, I will usually reply here - if you want a {{talkback}} notice, please request it. If I left a message for you on your talk page, I have it on my watchlist and will see replies made on your talk page. Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~). I reserve the right at my discretion to remove uncivil comments from this page, as well as threads which are perceived by me to be disruptive. My alternate talkpage can be used to contact me if Wikipedia indicates that this page is protected due to vandalism.	Please note: This talk page is known to be monitored by talk page watchers. This means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot respond to quickly is appreciated. Server time (): October 14, 2024 23:05 (UTC)

My talk page archives
• 2007  • 2008  • 2009  • 2010  • 2011  • 2012  • 2013  • 2014  • 2015  • 2016  • 2017  • 2018  • 2019  • 2020  • 2021  • 2022  • 2023  • 2024

Gunn High School

Dude - deleting page edits to Gunn High School while someone is trying to make edits is jerk like behavior. you are being abusive. please stop it.

Please leave the Gunn High School Page alone while my son works on editing it. Your behavior in reverting changes while he is working on the pages seems just plain rude and nasty. There is no freaking harm being done to anyone, and frankly, reverting changes like that breaks the model of wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.36.222.246 (talk) 05:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

As I explained at user talk:Puppyspencer, Wikipedia has a notability guideline listed at WP:BIO. The person you are attempting to add to Gunn High School has not been shown to meet the threshold established by that guideline, nor has any source been provided that connects the person to the school, per WP:RS and WP:V.

Additionally, as explained at WP:BRD, if your edits are reverted, the correct next step is to discuss those changes on the article talk page. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 06:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your attention please

Dear Barek, I keep forgetting if Hammersoft is an admin or not, but Hemmersuft (talk · contribs) is at best a VOA and at worst an impersonater as well. See his recent edit to L. Ron Hubbard, which I cannot revert. 207.157.121.52 (talk) 19:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

• And maybe you can delete File:L Ron Hubbad.jpg as well. I don't know the templates for Commons. Thank you much. 207.157.121.52 (talk) 19:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Someone else got to both the article and the image before I did (reverting and tagging for deletion) - thanks for reporting them. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. The picture was kind of fun and would have looked good as your Facebook profile pic. :) 207.157.121.52 (talk) 19:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

wtf? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

It's a joke, Barek. We all know you're the best looking admin around, and thanks again for blocking that vandal. :) (note the smiley face) 207.157.121.52 (talk) 20:04, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Montgomery,Pa

The last entry to the Montgomery,Pa has been added to promote external awareness and interest in Montgomery's established and growing popular culture folk lure tourism industry. The information conttained in the edit is considered constructive and significant. The edit in question has been reinterred onto the Montgomery,Pa page.

If there are specific complaints and/or issues, the entry can be modified at that time.

Thank you for your efforts to keep Wikipieda a reliable source of usable information. I can understand how this entry could be construed as less than genuine.

Respectfully,

WE ARE MONTGOMERY — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.191.107.185 (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

(Talk page stalker) I've re-removed the text, largely because there is no reliable source provided to back the claims up. —C.Fred (talk) 02:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Karl Pilkington

Please do not randomly delete things or make accusations without evidence. Evertime I've undone your changes I've added references to the stated issue. Pay more attention in future. 78.145.92.13 (talk) 03:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Your personal attack in the edit summary of your first revert was entirely inappropriate. However, you are correct that I missed the addition of the refs in that same edit. Thank you for adding the required refs. I have commented further on your own talk page. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Inappropriate perhaps but it's frustrating when people don't do a 1 minute search to verify something as appose to just deleting a whole section. Please use:

for facts which are questionable and need to be verified.