Talk:SpeedFan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:11, 10 March 2013

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing: Software Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

drive-by tagging

This article received a drive-by tag of advert, npov, and cleanup, with no discussion in the talk page. I'm not disputing any of it, but removed the tags until someone can discuss the relevant points. wraith808 (talk) 18:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SpeedFan crashed my computer

I edited this article after SpeedFan crashed my computer & corrupted the registry. I chose to reinstall XP rather than take my chances, since registry corruption was obvious; my computer is for professional multi-track audio recording, and I can't have any instability. I found so many references to this happening to others that I had to warn people about this, hence my added "Dangers" section.

I'm not a regular wiki contributor, and I don't have an account, but if you want to contact me you can do this via d0s4d1@yahoo.com.

dosadi (talk) 01:51, 17 July 2010 (EST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.72.87.247 (talk)

This is correct. Any kind of power failure, unclosed files, and so on, can cause corruption. BTW: If you had a system restore point from before installing SpeedFan, this could have been fixed in 5 minutes. 71.196.246.113 (talk) 20:01, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some n00b undid my edits with no talk page

User 109.154.160.28 undid the edits I made in SpeedFan's article. This user has made no other Wikipedia contributions.

My edits were appropriate, pointing out the risk of installing Ring 0 software (software that can do *anything* to your computer). I documented links to discussion forums & web pages that showed evidence of the software causing computers to crash, which carries the risk of data corruption.

So who is this 109.154.160.28 who changed it? Can we have a discussion first? I'm going to restore that section for now, and if I did something wrong, can someone tell me rather than just change things with no conversation?

Crashes attribution

The entire section of crashing is attributed to one unverified forum post. This hardly seems accurate. D0s4d1 (talk) 07:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Keila[reply]

Actually, it even says in the manuals of these types of programs that they can crash the PC... It warns you in SpeedFan specifically that disabling fans or tweaking CPU speeds can 'lead to system instability'. On some chipsets, just 'probing' them with the wrong method will crash some chip on the bus, possibly even including the bridges. That's why there's a big warning on the chipset tweaker in pretty much ALL such programs. SpeedFan, i8k, etc. Go look them up. ;) Calling it a rootkit is partially correct, in the same way that a parallel-port bit-banging driver or antivirus is. The actually correct technical terms are pointer or reflection or redirect or vector depending on the technology (Intel used the term interrupt vector and DOS programmers kept the term, for example). It's essentially like a software interrupt but patches the pointers instead of instructions. 71.196.246.113 (talk) 20:11, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 The entire section of crashing is attributed to one unverified forum post. This hardly seems accurate.
 [[User:D0s4d1|D0s4d1]] ([[User talk:D0s4d1|talk]]) 07:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Keila
+:Actually, it even says in the manuals of these types of programs that they can crash the PC...  It warns you in SpeedFan specifically that disabling fans or tweaking CPU speeds can 'lead to system instability'.  On some chipsets, just 'probing' them with the wrong method will crash some chip on the bus, possibly even including the bridges.  That's why there's a big warning on the chipset tweaker in pretty much ALL such programs.  SpeedFan, i8k, etc.  Go look them up.  ;)  Calling it a rootkit is partially correct, in the same way that a parallel-port bit-banging driver or antivirus is.  The actually correct technical terms are pointer or reflection or redirect or vector depending on the technology  (Intel used the term interrupt vector and DOS programmers kept the term, for example).  It's essentially like a software interrupt but patches the pointers instead of instructions.  [[Special:Contributions/71.196.246.113|71.196.246.113]] ([[User talk:71.196.246.113|talk]]) 20:11, 10 March 2013 (UTC)