Complete-linkage clustering: Difference between revisions
restore category |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Mathematically, the complete linkage function — the distance <math>D(X,Y)</math> between clusters <math>X</math> and <math>Y</math> — is described by the following expression : |
Mathematically, the complete linkage function — the distance <math>D(X,Y)</math> between clusters <math>X</math> and <math>Y</math> — is described by the following expression : |
||
<math>D(X,Y)= \ |
<math>D(X,Y)= \max_{x\in X, y\in Y} d(x,y)</math> |
||
where |
where |
Revision as of 15:02, 19 March 2013
This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2010) |
![]() | This article needs attention from an expert in Statistics. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article.(February 2011) |
In cluster analysis, complete linkage or farthest neighbour is a method of calculating distances between clusters in agglomerative hierarchical clustering. In complete linkage,[1] the distance between two clusters is computed as the maximum distance between a pair of objects, one in one cluster, and one in the other.[2]
As an agglomerative procedure, the clusters are initially the singletons (single-member clusters). At each stage the individuals or groups of individuals that are closest according to the linkage criterion are joined to form a new, larger cluster. At the last stage, a single group consisting of all individuals is formed.
Mathematically, the complete linkage function — the distance between clusters and — is described by the following expression :
where
- is the distance between elements and ;
- and are two sets of elements (clusters)
Complete linkage clustering avoids a drawback of the alternative single linkage method - the so-called chaining phenomenon, where clusters formed via single linkage clustering may be forced together due to single elements being close to each other, even though many of the elements in each cluster may be very distant to each other. Complete linkage tends to find compact clusters of approximately equal diameters.[3]
Naive Algorithm
The following algorithm is an agglomerative scheme that erases rows and columns in a proximity matrix as old clusters are merged into new ones. The proximity matrix D contains all distances d(i,j). The clusterings are assigned sequence numbers 0,1,......, (n − 1) and L(k) is the level of the kth clustering. A cluster with sequence number m is denoted (m) and the proximity between clusters (r) and (s) is denoted d[(r),(s)].
The algorithm is composed of the following steps:
- Begin with the disjoint clustering having level L(0) = 0 and sequence number m = 0.
- Find the most similar pair of clusters in the current clustering, say pair (r), (s), according to d[(r),(s)] = max d[(i),(j)] where the maximum is over all pairs of clusters in the current clustering.
- Increment the sequence number: m = m + 1. Merge clusters (r) and (s) into a single cluster to form the next clustering m. Set the level of this clustering to L(m) = d[(r),(s)]
- Update the proximity matrix, D, by deleting the rows and columns corresponding to clusters (r) and (s) and adding a row and column corresponding to the newly formed cluster. The proximity between the new cluster, denoted (r,s) and old cluster (k) is defined as d[(k), (r,s)] = max d[(k),(r)], d[(k),(s)].
- If all objects are in one cluster, stop. Else, go to step 2.
Optimally efficient algorithm
The algorithm explained above is easy to understand but of complexity . In 1977, D. Defays proposed an optimally efficient algorithm of only complexity known as CLINK[4] inspired by the similar algorithm SLINK for single-linkage clustering.
![]() | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (October 2011) |
Other linkages
Alternative linkage schemes include single linkage and average linkage clustering - implementing a different linkage in the naive algorithm is simply a matter of using a different formula to calculate inter-cluster distances in the initial computation of the proximity matrix and in step 4 of the above algorithm. An optimally efficient algorithm is however not available for arbitrary linkages. The formula that should be adjusted has been highlighted using bold text.
Notes
References
- Brian S. Everitt, Sabine Landau, and Morven Leese (2001). Cluster Analysis (Fourth ed.). London: Arnold. ISBN 0-340-76119-9.
{{cite book}}
: Text "." ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- T. Sorensen (1948). "A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons". Biologiske Skrifter. 5: 1–34.
{{cite journal}}
: Text "." ignored (help)