Talk:Charity Navigator: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
RaptureBot (talk | contribs) m Updating image uses from File:Evolution-tasks.png to File:Evolution-tasks2.png (BOT) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
A while back, I noticed that a portion of the methodology section providing some balance on Charity Navigator's methodology had been deleted without explanation, so I revised that segment to make it more neutral and replaced it. Since then, an anonymous user has twice removed this portion without comment. I firmly believe that this section belongs in this article to provide an informed view of Charity Navigator's methods. If there's a reason for the repeated removal, I'd like to hear it articulated. [[User:Ashdog137|Ashdog137]] 20:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC) |
A while back, I noticed that a portion of the methodology section providing some balance on Charity Navigator's methodology had been deleted without explanation, so I revised that segment to make it more neutral and replaced it. Since then, an anonymous user has twice removed this portion without comment. I firmly believe that this section belongs in this article to provide an informed view of Charity Navigator's methods. If there's a reason for the repeated removal, I'd like to hear it articulated. [[User:Ashdog137|Ashdog137]] 20:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
I assume the word in the last sentence of the article should be 'against' not 'again'. L.M. 3/22/2013 |
|||
Revision as of 14:47, 22 March 2013
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 February 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Charity Navigator. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2006022110008429. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Repeated removal of portion of methodology section
A while back, I noticed that a portion of the methodology section providing some balance on Charity Navigator's methodology had been deleted without explanation, so I revised that segment to make it more neutral and replaced it. Since then, an anonymous user has twice removed this portion without comment. I firmly believe that this section belongs in this article to provide an informed view of Charity Navigator's methods. If there's a reason for the repeated removal, I'd like to hear it articulated. Ashdog137 20:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
I assume the word in the last sentence of the article should be 'against' not 'again'. L.M. 3/22/2013