Jump to content

User talk:Moosehadley: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 3d) to User talk:Moosehadley/Archive 1.
→‎Vaginismus: new section
Line 30: Line 30:


-Malcolm <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.140.122.37|64.140.122.37]] ([[User talk:64.140.122.37|talk]]) 00:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-Malcolm <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.140.122.37|64.140.122.37]] ([[User talk:64.140.122.37|talk]]) 00:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Vaginismus ==

Hello, the previous edit is not vandalism, please consult sources about it. [[Special:Contributions/141.136.222.121|141.136.222.121]] ([[User talk:141.136.222.121|talk]]) 14:57, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:57, 3 April 2013

I noticed that within minutes you reverting an edit which replaced zoo with a fur farm. I really appreciate your reaction, and the edit indeed looked like vandalisom, but this is a rare case when impressions are mistaken - that was indeed a fur farm, I just overlooked it previously. Additionally, I happen to know the editor (assuming User:Timur Maisak is his real name). So I checked again and restored his edit. Sorry for thet. Your efforts are much appreciated.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subcouncils of the City of Cape Town edits

Hi Moose, I am the Subcouncils writer for the City of Cape Town and I am in the process of updating the Wikipedia entry with the latest detail. You are welcome to assist with neatening up my entries, but please don't remove the edits. Thanks. 41.208.10.82 (talk) 07:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ORTHOMOLECULAR MEDICINE/ABRAM HOFFER

I have received your comment that my insertion of information in the articles on orthomolecular medicine and Dr. Abram Hoffer violate Wikipedia's neutrality rule. If certain foods have been repeatedly demonstrated, for thousands of years, to confer health benefits on the eater (specifically plant foods), why is it a violation of neutrality to mention this, and to mention that animal "foods" not designed for consumption by the human body, cause health problems? Wikipedia of course will do what it wants. I continue to assert that pro-ill health bias, as is glaringly evident in the original article, is a violation of neutrality. I assert this truth because I am not beholden to the AMA or the successful US economy. For further discussion please email me at <zalmoxis@sbcglobal.net>. Thank you. 173.11.121.73 (talk) 18:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Drake being in "Southern Hip Hop"

Date: 2/17/2013

Hello, I just wonder why Drake is listed under Southern Hip Hop when he is a Canadian rapper with very little influence in or from sothern hip hop music stylistically. It honestly make very little sense for a Canadian rapper to be put under a category of an area of the U.S.(specifically Atlanta) he's not from. Why is he there?


-Malcolm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.140.122.37 (talk) 00:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vaginismus

Hello, the previous edit is not vandalism, please consult sources about it. 141.136.222.121 (talk) 14:57, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]