Jump to content

User:EbedYahweh: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
EbedYahweh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
EbedYahweh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User Wikiproject Grammar}}{{Template:User dst 3}}{{User:EWikist/Userboxes/MistakeBox}}{{User:Wikipedian19265478/Cluttered}}
{{EbedYahweh Wikiproject Grammar}}{{Template:User dst 3}}{{User:EWikist/Userboxes/MistakeBox}}{{User:Wikipedian19265478/Cluttered}}


{{cquote|Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance.}} <div align="right">-- Albert Einstein</div>
{{cquote|Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance.}} <div align="right">-- Albert Einstein</div>

Revision as of 21:42, 5 April 2013

Template:EbedYahweh Wikiproject Grammar

This user loathes, but is forced to observe, daylight saving time.
This userbox was put here by mistake.
This user knows that their user page is a mess, and likes it that way.


-- Albert Einstein


-- Martin Luther King Jr.

Interesting from Wikipedia

Check out my book: User:EbedYahweh/Books/Interesting

Bias of Wikipedia

Wikipedia is a great source of information in most cases (though not a cite-able source). However, on controversial topics, it is most certainly biased, despite whatever the bias guidelines of Wikipedia may say. The bias of Wikipedia is as follows:

  • FOR macro-evolution, and abiogenesis and any other parts of this worldview
  • Liberal with respect to American Politics (see the derogatory statements about Rick Santorum)

Great evidences for Creation (or young earth)/against Evolution

Chirality

Life couldn't have come from non-life because of the problem of chirality (specifically, enantiomeric resolution). I might add more details here later...

Rapid Decay theory

Dr. Russel Humphreys article This article explains in an amazing way how the Rapid-decay theory correctly reproduced and predicted known and unknown (at the time) data of planetary magnetic fields. The Dynamo Theory has never been this consistent with evidence.