Talk:File archiver: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:03, 7 April 2013

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This subarticle is kept separate from the main article, Archive file, due to size or style considerations.

File Chopper

I was hoping this article would help me pick an application to help me chop a file. IE break it into pieces small enough I could email them. Mathiastck 18:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article presumes that a file is a computer file and that an archive is something that exists only in a computer. Files and archives pre-existed computers. The title and content of the article might recognize this.

JZip article nominated for deletion

Please help discuss that on its AfD page. --AVRS 16:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usefulness of a Wikipedia article, even if it's a Stub.

Hello, I was "distressed" to find a Spell Check program (abiword for Linux) that sited archiver as an invalid word. Note that the editor of this talk page also flagged this word. So, even if this is a Stub article, with at least two "problems" that could get it deleted, I wanted you people to know that, at least one person benefited from the fact that this is a word that belongs in Spell Checker programs. Thank you! Kenneth Parker, Seattle, WA.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Please help discuss that on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JZip|its AfD page]]. --[[User:AVRS|AVRS]] 16:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
+== Usefulness of a Wikipedia article, even if it's a Stub. ==
+Hello, I was "distressed" to find a Spell Check program (abiword for Linux) that sited archiver as an invalid word.  Note that the editor of this talk page also flagged this word.  So, even if this is a Stub article, with at least two "problems" that could get it deleted, I wanted you people to know that, at least one person benefited from the fact that this is a word that belongs in Spell Checker programs.  Thank you!  Kenneth Parker, Seattle, WA.