Talk:Eta Virginis: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Citation needed: new section |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The article on Timocharis says that he was born in about 320 B.C. I am not sure that he saw an occultation in 329 B.C., 9 years before he was born. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.149.200.116|86.149.200.116]] ([[User talk:86.149.200.116|talk]]) 12:04, 17 March 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
The article on Timocharis says that he was born in about 320 B.C. I am not sure that he saw an occultation in 329 B.C., 9 years before he was born. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.149.200.116|86.149.200.116]] ([[User talk:86.149.200.116|talk]]) 12:04, 17 March 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
: The error has been corrected. Thank you for catching the problem. Regards, [[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 15:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC) |
: The error has been corrected. Thank you for catching the problem. Regards, [[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 15:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Citation needed == |
|||
I jut fixed what appeared to minor vandalism and grammar errors in the first sentence of the second paragraph of the lead. That sentence has a citation tag that appears to be covered at the end of the paragraph. Is the tag really needed? |
Revision as of 04:02, 9 April 2013
![]() | Astronomy: Astronomical objects C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
Anachronism
The article on Timocharis says that he was born in about 320 B.C. I am not sure that he saw an occultation in 329 B.C., 9 years before he was born. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.200.116 (talk) 12:04, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- The error has been corrected. Thank you for catching the problem. Regards, RJH (talk) 15:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Citation needed
I jut fixed what appeared to minor vandalism and grammar errors in the first sentence of the second paragraph of the lead. That sentence has a citation tag that appears to be covered at the end of the paragraph. Is the tag really needed?