User talk:Bendersghost

Wikipedia is operating a policy of stealth plagiarism by taking unique information that is published by authors, to correct its own errors, and then justifying not citing the authors whose unique discovery they just plagiarized on the grounds that the site where they published it is deemed by Wikipedia to be unreliable. Wikipedia has been publicly shamed for it here:

I would like to know what will be done to correct this disgracefully psychopathic, irrational, self-serving unethical behavior.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Moral panic, you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

You, Orange Mike, are merely operating within a cult that thrives by lazily plagiarizing the original work of mythbusters. The consequence of your behavior and that of other Wikipedia editors is to produce the unintended consequence of ensuring that fallacies are now going to stay in the public domain for longer than would otherwise be possible by utilization of internet technology. Your lazy plagiarism of innovative myth busting originators will stop them from freely entering the results of their endeavors into the public domain because the likes of you are pretending (plagiarizing new information) that you bust the myth. Consequently, easily corruptible academics will take information from Wikipedia and remain silent while the whole world thinks they discovered new information. I see your attempts to rationalize your plagiarism were shot down in flames on the Best Thinking site where your fellow Wikipedians stole unique information. And you have the audacity to call me a vandal SHAME ON YOU!!! You immoral plagiarizer! Everyone look here at how Orange Mike fails to justify being a shameless plagiarizer: http://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=20733