User talk:89.204.135.68: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
I submit M'lud that the accused is guilty of the aforementioned utterance |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi 89 - I would be delighted to find you a representative example of Zad stating that the circumcision article is or should be about the clinical procedure, but it would be vastly simpler and easier for you to ask the editor whether he/she has said so and where. Is there a reason why you stay an IP (is that the term?) number and do not fully join WP - would you be willing to share the reason ? I have not seen Zad deny that he has said so -only several greek chorus singers clamouring in a misguided defence. What would be the consequences for you, your attitude or the article he/she or I confirm that he has said so ? --— [[User:Tumadoireacht|⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht]] <sup>[[User talk:Tumadoireacht|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Tumadoireacht|Stalk]]</sub> 20:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi 89 - I would be delighted to find you a representative example of Zad stating that the circumcision article is or should be about the clinical procedure, but it would be vastly simpler and easier for you to ask the editor whether he/she has said so and where. Is there a reason why you stay an IP (is that the term?) number and do not fully join WP - would you be willing to share the reason ? I have not seen Zad deny that he has said so -only several greek chorus singers clamouring in a misguided defence. What would be the consequences for you, your attitude or the article he/she or I confirm that he has said so ? --— [[User:Tumadoireacht|⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht]] <sup>[[User talk:Tumadoireacht|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Tumadoireacht|Stalk]]</sub> 20:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Hi Tuma, thanks for your note. In general, the burden of proof rests on people making an assertion, in this case you. You may want to move this conversation to your Talk page, by tomorrow my IP will likely have changed.--[[Special:Contributions/89.204.135.68|89.204.135.68]] ([[User talk:89.204.135.68#top|talk]]) 20:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:25, 30 May 2013
Hi 89 - I would be delighted to find you a representative example of Zad stating that the circumcision article is or should be about the clinical procedure, but it would be vastly simpler and easier for you to ask the editor whether he/she has said so and where. Is there a reason why you stay an IP (is that the term?) number and do not fully join WP - would you be willing to share the reason ? I have not seen Zad deny that he has said so -only several greek chorus singers clamouring in a misguided defence. What would be the consequences for you, your attitude or the article he/she or I confirm that he has said so ? --— ⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht Talk/Stalk 20:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Tuma, thanks for your note. In general, the burden of proof rests on people making an assertion, in this case you. You may want to move this conversation to your Talk page, by tomorrow my IP will likely have changed.--89.204.135.68 (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)