Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fact reporter: Difference between revisions
CheckUser results |
→Comments by other users: question on another account |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
*{{User|Bigrichtexas}} |
|||
Wondering if this account, which has similar COI issues, is related. [[Special:Contributions/76.248.151.159|76.248.151.159]] ([[User talk:76.248.151.159|talk]]) 19:52, 7 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
Revision as of 19:52, 7 July 2013
Fact reporter
- Fact reporter (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
07 July 2013
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Fact reporter1 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Usernames are identical. Both have extensively Pamela Martin Duarte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Hannah Martin Duarte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), and Big Rich Texas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (evident from page histories). Both seem to have this obsession with keeping these recently created articles from deletion despite the articles' shortcomings and failures to meet proper sourcing requirements. —Ryulong (琉竜) 18:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Fact reporter1 has admitted to this fact but has revealed he works for a firm that performs edits on behalf of clients. It is important to see what other accounts may be operated by this firm to see if other articles may have conflict of interest issues.—Ryulong (琉竜) 18:43, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Bigrichtexas (talk · contribs)
Wondering if this account, which has similar COI issues, is related. 76.248.151.159 (talk) 19:52, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Technically indistinguishable. No sleepers found. Tiptoety talk 19:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
