Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Magus007: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
LEpstein5 (talk | contribs)
Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=no <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above t...'
 
LEpstein5 (talk | contribs)
Line 15: Line 15:
*[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/editorinteract.html Editor interaction utility]
*[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/editorinteract.html Editor interaction utility]


See the [[Alpha et Omega]] article. These three users appear to be engaging in meat puppetry. Magus007 is the moniker in the blogosphere of the author Nick Farrell. In other words, this editor is the author himself adding his own books to the article as references. Two other editors enter the discussion fully supporting the author's self-promoting behavior one of whom (JMax555 who is Joseph Max) is a member of an organization friendly to the author. If one googles these names there is plenty of evidence. Additionally, these three editors have collaborated together before in a similar way in support of the author Pat Zalewski. See the [[Articles for deletion/Pat Zalewski]] discussion. Pat Zalewski, incidentally, is an author strongly allied with the author Nick Farrell as an internet search will show. Finally, if one checks the contributions of these editors one will see very similar pages being edited with very similar affiliations. [[User:LEpstein5|LEpstein5]] ([[User talk:LEpstein5|talk]]) 17:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
See the [[Alpha et Omega]] article. These three users appear to be engaging in meat puppetry. Magus007 is the moniker in the blogosphere of the author Nick Farrell. In other words, this editor is the author himself adding his own books to the article as references. Two other editors enter the discussion fully supporting the author's self-promoting behavior one of whom (JMax555 who is Joseph Max) is a member of an organization friendly to the author. If one googles these names there is plenty of evidence. Additionally, these three editors have collaborated together before in a similar way in support of the author Pat Zalewski. See the [[Articles for deletion/Pat Zalewski(2nd nomination)]] discussion. Pat Zalewski, incidentally, is an author strongly allied with the author Nick Farrell as an internet search will show. Finally, if one checks the contributions of these editors one will see very similar pages being edited with very similar affiliations. [[User:LEpstein5|LEpstein5]] ([[User talk:LEpstein5|talk]]) 17:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======

Revision as of 17:47, 13 July 2013

magus007

magus007 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Please note that a case was originally opened under Magus007 (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/magus007. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/magus007.
13 July 2013

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


See the Alpha et Omega article. These three users appear to be engaging in meat puppetry. Magus007 is the moniker in the blogosphere of the author Nick Farrell. In other words, this editor is the author himself adding his own books to the article as references. Two other editors enter the discussion fully supporting the author's self-promoting behavior one of whom (JMax555 who is Joseph Max) is a member of an organization friendly to the author. If one googles these names there is plenty of evidence. Additionally, these three editors have collaborated together before in a similar way in support of the author Pat Zalewski. See the Articles for deletion/Pat Zalewski(2nd nomination) discussion. Pat Zalewski, incidentally, is an author strongly allied with the author Nick Farrell as an internet search will show. Finally, if one checks the contributions of these editors one will see very similar pages being edited with very similar affiliations. LEpstein5 (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments