User talk:Czello: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by 81.178.244.213 (talk) to last revision by EdwardsBot. (TW) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:I was corresponding with you for your edits to EVula's userpage. I'd like to remind you that [[WP:FREE|Wikipedia does not have free speech]], and citing it does not give you free reign to edit someone else's userpage. — '''''[[User:Richard BB|<font color="#8000FF">Richard</font>]] [[User talk:Richard BB|<font color="#8000FF">BB</font>]]''''' 09:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC) |
:I was corresponding with you for your edits to EVula's userpage. I'd like to remind you that [[WP:FREE|Wikipedia does not have free speech]], and citing it does not give you free reign to edit someone else's userpage. — '''''[[User:Richard BB|<font color="#8000FF">Richard</font>]] [[User talk:Richard BB|<font color="#8000FF">BB</font>]]''''' 09:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Free speech? I would settle for the Wikipedia being honest. When I point out that the English Defence League page is a complete travesty, citing 37 different lies, exaggerations, libels, etc, they are ignored. ([[User:Cyberia3|Cyberia3]] ([[User talk:Cyberia3|talk]]) 16:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)) |
|||
== ''The Signpost'': 10 July 2013 == |
== ''The Signpost'': 10 July 2013 == |
Revision as of 16:04, 1 August 2013
![]() |
DrEdna
Perhaps we have not met. I am DOCTOR Edna.To whom are you attempting to correspond with on my talk page? You seem to have me confused with somebody else. Please respect free speech and the right of people to correspond my open sourced Wikipedia friend. I will not tolerate harassment from common folk.
- I was corresponding with you for your edits to EVula's userpage. I'd like to remind you that Wikipedia does not have free speech, and citing it does not give you free reign to edit someone else's userpage. — Richard BB 09:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Free speech? I would settle for the Wikipedia being honest. When I point out that the English Defence League page is a complete travesty, citing 37 different lies, exaggerations, libels, etc, they are ignored. (Cyberia3 (talk) 16:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC))
The Signpost: 10 July 2013
- WikiProject report: Not Jimbo: WikiProject Wales
- Traffic report: Inflated view counts here, there, and everywhere
- Dispatches: Infoboxes: time for a fresh look?
- Featured content: The week of the birds
- Discussion report: Featured article process governance, signature templates, and more
?
Why did you revert sourced information??
Black people in Nazi Germany — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.187.57 (talk) 19:53, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- My edit summary explained why. — Richard BB 20:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 July 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Square Enix
- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation's new plans announced
- Featured content: Documents and sports
The Signpost: 24 July 2013
- In the media: Wikipedia flamewars
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Religion
- Discussion report: Partially disambiguated page names, page protection policy, and more
- Traffic report: Gleeless
- Featured content: Engineering and the arts
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes case opens