Talk:Philomath: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 87.221.139.235 - "→What, more specifically, is a lover of learning?: new section" |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So what are the characteristics of a lover of learning? I came to this page hoping to delve into this concept more. I wondered "does a lover of learning love to interact with all subject material? Can a lover of learning dislike learning about some things or think that some things are boring and therefore not be interested in them, or would this disqualify them as a lover of learning?" <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.221.139.235|87.221.139.235]] ([[User talk:87.221.139.235|talk]]) 11:33, 23 May 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
So what are the characteristics of a lover of learning? I came to this page hoping to delve into this concept more. I wondered "does a lover of learning love to interact with all subject material? Can a lover of learning dislike learning about some things or think that some things are boring and therefore not be interested in them, or would this disqualify them as a lover of learning?" <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.221.139.235|87.221.139.235]] ([[User talk:87.221.139.235|talk]]) 11:33, 23 May 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:I would assume. I'm a philomath, except when it comes to math itself. [[Special:Contributions/76.18.160.47|76.18.160.47]] ([[User talk:76.18.160.47|talk]]) 20:56, 2 August 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:56, 2 August 2013
"(fil-O-math-ee)" should be brought into line with IPA. Nagelfar (talk) 10:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
What, more specifically, is a lover of learning?
So what are the characteristics of a lover of learning? I came to this page hoping to delve into this concept more. I wondered "does a lover of learning love to interact with all subject material? Can a lover of learning dislike learning about some things or think that some things are boring and therefore not be interested in them, or would this disqualify them as a lover of learning?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.221.139.235 (talk) 11:33, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- I would assume. I'm a philomath, except when it comes to math itself. 76.18.160.47 (talk) 20:56, 2 August 2013 (UTC)