Talk:List of Google products: Difference between revisions
Mporcheron (talk | contribs) Archived |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Should you be concerned the week long poll (and results) can be found [[Talk:List_of_Google_services_and_tools/Talk_Archive/June_2006#Split_Article_.28Poll.29|here]] |
Should you be concerned the week long poll (and results) can be found [[Talk:List_of_Google_services_and_tools/Talk_Archive/June_2006#Split_Article_.28Poll.29|here]] |
||
[[User:Mporcheron|Martin Porcheron]] 11:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC) |
[[User:Mporcheron|Martin Porcheron]] 11:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Copy Editing == |
|||
I have made an attempt at copy editing: |
|||
-Sorted out some clumsy English and typos |
|||
-Made the first sentence of each a summary of the service |
|||
-Removed ePayements, as doesn't seem to be official Google Service yet |
|||
-Removed some extraneous information which should be in main article |
|||
-Stopped dates being links |
|||
-Removed Google Translate, it is part of Google Language Tools |
|||
-Removed some errors, or statements for which there is no evidence on internet |
|||
If anyone can be bothered it might be a good idea to have categories in the table, e.g: |
|||
-Date created |
|||
-Cost |
|||
-Beta status |
|||
Or, perhaps this information shouldn't be on this page at all. |
|||
The page reads badly in places, and the information about a service often seems to be rather arbitrary, but I think it is better than before. |
Revision as of 20:11, 4 June 2006
Archives
An archive of this discussion page for anything started before June 1 can be found here. An archive of the article page before being changed to the new table layout can be found here.
Should you be concerned the week long poll (and results) can be found here Martin Porcheron 11:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Copy Editing
I have made an attempt at copy editing: -Sorted out some clumsy English and typos -Made the first sentence of each a summary of the service -Removed ePayements, as doesn't seem to be official Google Service yet -Removed some extraneous information which should be in main article -Stopped dates being links -Removed Google Translate, it is part of Google Language Tools -Removed some errors, or statements for which there is no evidence on internet
If anyone can be bothered it might be a good idea to have categories in the table, e.g: -Date created -Cost -Beta status
Or, perhaps this information shouldn't be on this page at all.
The page reads badly in places, and the information about a service often seems to be rather arbitrary, but I think it is better than before.