Jump to content

Talk:Employment reference letter: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
I strongly agree. This article is about German reference letters, which are unique in the world. There is no reference to reference letters we know in english spoken countries. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.183.128.143|212.183.128.143]] ([[User talk:212.183.128.143|talk]]) 17:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I strongly agree. This article is about German reference letters, which are unique in the world. There is no reference to reference letters we know in english spoken countries. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.183.128.143|212.183.128.143]] ([[User talk:212.183.128.143|talk]]) 17:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


:I disagree with regards to the lack of relevance. In a German business/legal context, employment reference letters are extremely important. The topic is certainly relevant enough to have a short article for non-German speakers. It is, however, debatable whether [[Reference letter]] should link to that article. I might clean up and reorganise a bit in the coming weeks, suggestions welcome. -- [[User:Sigi fikanz|Sigi fikanz]] ([[User talk:Sigi fikanz|talk]]) 19:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
:I disagree with regards to the lack of relevance. In a German business/legal context, employment reference letters are extremely important. The topic is certainly relevant enough to have a short article for non-German speakers. It is, however, debatable whether [[Reference letter]] should link to that article. I might clean up and reorganise a bit in the coming weeks, suggestions welcome. EDIT: That said, there are actually factual errors in the current article which I will correct. -- [[User:Sigi fikanz|Sigi fikanz]] ([[User talk:Sigi fikanz|talk]]) 19:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:16, 18 August 2013

WikiProject iconEconomics Redirect‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Relevance

This is an English article. Information on German employment reference letters is largely irrelevant. I know that these letters have been written in other countries as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.190.127.229 (talk) 05:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly agree. This article is about German reference letters, which are unique in the world. There is no reference to reference letters we know in english spoken countries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.128.143 (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with regards to the lack of relevance. In a German business/legal context, employment reference letters are extremely important. The topic is certainly relevant enough to have a short article for non-German speakers. It is, however, debatable whether Reference letter should link to that article. I might clean up and reorganise a bit in the coming weeks, suggestions welcome. EDIT: That said, there are actually factual errors in the current article which I will correct. -- Sigi fikanz (talk) 19:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]