Jump to content

Talk:Breast augmentation: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Gronky (talk | contribs)
Otto Placik (talk | contribs)
m →‎Let's not use marketing terms: Removed marketing-speak language; restored NPOV.
Line 39: Line 39:


I changed the intro to remove a lot of marketing-speak about "aesthetically enhancing the natural size" of breasts etc. Here's my edit: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Breast_augmentation&diff=557874290&oldid=554982408]. [[User:Gronky|Gronky]] ([[User talk:Gronky|talk]]) 19:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
I changed the intro to remove a lot of marketing-speak about "aesthetically enhancing the natural size" of breasts etc. Here's my edit: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Breast_augmentation&diff=557874290&oldid=554982408]. [[User:Gronky|Gronky]] ([[User talk:Gronky|talk]]) 19:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

:Follow up response:

:I have edited the text, and restored the medical article impartiality.

:[[User:Otto Placik|Otto Placik]] ([[User talk:Otto Placik|talk]]) 15:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:47, 22 August 2013

WikiProject iconBody Modification Unassessed (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Body Modification, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconMedicine B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technique section

might we be able to add a technique section?

File:Breasts.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Breasts.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:56, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

image filenames

all the attempts at keyword spamming in image filenames ("Dr._Placik_Chicago_Arlington_Heights_IL") needs to go. thank you dr placik for contributing but please keep filenames generic. this is not an advertising venue for your practice nor an acceptable method of stuffing keywords into search engines. 75.129.62.48 (talk) 10:13, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Enlargement" is more neutral than "aumentation"

There's a discussion elsewhere which might be more relevant here:

. Gronky (talk) 12:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Size Info

This article is severly information-limited, eschewing basic information for speculation and critical conversation instead. Please consider revisiting the basics of Wikipedia regarding this article!

At the very least there needs to be present a table(s) relating gram-weight sizes to final cup-sizes, and a presentation of size increase after implant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.2.69.235 (talk) 03:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not use marketing terms

I changed the intro to remove a lot of marketing-speak about "aesthetically enhancing the natural size" of breasts etc. Here's my edit: [1]. Gronky (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up response:
I have edited the text, and restored the medical article impartiality.
Otto Placik (talk) 15:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]