Wikipedia talk:Editor review/Dodger67: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Wikicheesecake - "→Qualitas Career Academy: new section" |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Play It Straight == |
|||
Hello, |
|||
It seems the submission of the novel Play It Straight was rejected again. The link is here: |
|||
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Play_It_Straight |
|||
I believe the sources are verifiable; there is a verifiable review of the book and a link to Epigram Press, which is the publisher of record of the novel. |
|||
Please explain what the issue is so it can be corrected. |
|||
[[User:EP PUB|EP PUB]] ([[User talk:EP PUB|talk]]) 21:54, 30 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Qualitas Career Academy == |
== Qualitas Career Academy == |
||
Line 18: | Line 4: | ||
On receiving an objection, you commented that you'd mark it as spam. |
On receiving an objection, you commented that you'd mark it as spam. |
||
The article can certainly be improved, rather offer improvement suggestions before recommending deletion. |
The article can certainly be improved, rather offer improvement suggestions before recommending deletion. |
||
The accreditations and multi site representation suggest this is more of a notable institution than a mere training company. |
The accreditations, date of establishment, and multi site representation suggest this is more of a notable institution than a mere training company. |
||
Note that the user also started the Damelin page, which evolved into a decent page, with multiple contributors over years. |
|||
⚫ | Rather provide useful feedback than going straight for deletion. |
||
Do you know the user/company personally that you would respond as you did? |
|||
⚫ |
Revision as of 20:00, 1 September 2013
Qualitas Career Academy
I noted that you marked this institution for speedy deletion. You cited your reasons. On receiving an objection, you commented that you'd mark it as spam. The article can certainly be improved, rather offer improvement suggestions before recommending deletion. The accreditations, date of establishment, and multi site representation suggest this is more of a notable institution than a mere training company. Note that the user also started the Damelin page, which evolved into a decent page, with multiple contributors over years.
Do you know the user/company personally that you would respond as you did?
Rather provide useful feedback than going straight for deletion/spam. Wikicheesecake (talk • contribs) 17:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)