Jump to content

User talk:IFreedom1212: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tarc (talk | contribs)
Line 17: Line 17:


Rather than [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bradley_Manning&diff=prev&oldid=571340462 saying] things like "I will continue to refer to him as a male as long as he has a dick and a Y chromosome", can you in the future (or even edit that comment now) phrase your opinion in a way that your opponents won't cherry-pick as an insult and ignore the opposition itself? It just gives them ammo for the "you're transphobic!" accusations. If that is actually your opinion, that's fine (though effective opposition to this needs to be grounded in Wikipedia policy as well), but perhaps consider phrasing it like "As long as he is physiological male, I will refer to him as ''he''" or somesuch. [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] ([[User talk:Tarc|talk]]) 13:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Rather than [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bradley_Manning&diff=prev&oldid=571340462 saying] things like "I will continue to refer to him as a male as long as he has a dick and a Y chromosome", can you in the future (or even edit that comment now) phrase your opinion in a way that your opponents won't cherry-pick as an insult and ignore the opposition itself? It just gives them ammo for the "you're transphobic!" accusations. If that is actually your opinion, that's fine (though effective opposition to this needs to be grounded in Wikipedia policy as well), but perhaps consider phrasing it like "As long as he is physiological male, I will refer to him as ''he''" or somesuch. [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] ([[User talk:Tarc|talk]]) 13:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

I see what you're saying but it does not seem necessary. My stern responses are, at least in my opinion, not as crass as those who demand I call Bradley a "she." I wrote that in such a way so that it would come off as something to the effect of "not only will I continue to refer to him by male pronouns, but how dare you ask me to do otherwise" or something like that. [[User:IFreedom1212|IFreedom1212]] ([[User talk:IFreedom1212#top|talk]]) 01:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:22, 4 September 2013

Double vote

Did you vote twice on Chelsea Manning? Pass a Method talk 20:16, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict

Hi IFreedom1212. Please be careful that when you add comments to a talk page that you do not remove others' comments. With this edit you removed Bob K31416's recent addition to the page. I've restored it. Thanks. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You did it again with Knowledgekid87's comment in this edit you made. I've fixed that one too. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rhetoric softening

Rather than saying things like "I will continue to refer to him as a male as long as he has a dick and a Y chromosome", can you in the future (or even edit that comment now) phrase your opinion in a way that your opponents won't cherry-pick as an insult and ignore the opposition itself? It just gives them ammo for the "you're transphobic!" accusations. If that is actually your opinion, that's fine (though effective opposition to this needs to be grounded in Wikipedia policy as well), but perhaps consider phrasing it like "As long as he is physiological male, I will refer to him as he" or somesuch. Tarc (talk) 13:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you're saying but it does not seem necessary. My stern responses are, at least in my opinion, not as crass as those who demand I call Bradley a "she." I wrote that in such a way so that it would come off as something to the effect of "not only will I continue to refer to him by male pronouns, but how dare you ask me to do otherwise" or something like that. IFreedom1212 (talk) 01:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]