User talk:Snertking: Difference between revisions
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Wurundjeri== |
==Wurundjeri== |
||
Good going with the Wurundjeri vandalism! Scary to think it stood there for three days. [[User:SeoMac|SeoMac]] ([[User talk:SeoMac|talk]]) 01:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC) |
Good going with the Wurundjeri vandalism! Scary to think it stood there for three days. [[User:SeoMac|SeoMac]] ([[User talk:SeoMac|talk]]) 01:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
== January 2013 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:Frotz|Frotz]]. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of [[Special:Contributions/Snertking|your recent contributions]] to [[:Smokeasy]] because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Frotz|my talk page]]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> -- [[User:Frotz|Frotz]]([[User_talk:Frotz|talk]]) 01:18, 14 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:53, 13 September 2013
Re: Mel Sembler page
Good day Snertking, and thank you for your message. Very clever of you to have spotted the commonality between this IP-range and the subject's domain. I can very confidently say however, that a request for page-protection at this article would likely be rejected, simply because protection is usually reserved for high-traffic situations (when an article is undergoing aggressive rapid-edit abuse), rather than troublesome or annoyance activity occurring over an extended period. My best advice would be to keep this article in your watch list and periodically revisit to review whatever changes have been made since your last edit. When a revert or content-restoration is necessary, the inclusion of a "see talk page" note in your edit-summary can go a long way, especially as much of your homework is already clearly explained there. In revert situations, I would also recommend the use of user-talk warnings, as they will eventually lead to blocks imposed against persistent abusers. Establishing a friendly line of communication and discussion with these IPs would be in the best interest of everyone. Other measures of resolve (or blocks) can of course be taken if the disruption continues, but only after these IPs have been sufficiently warned and have failed to respond to your discussion requests. I'd happily assist you with taking the matter to the next level at that point, but with any luck, they already know that you're onto them, and will simply just give it up. Feel free to contact me at any time if this advice doesn't appear to be working very well for you. Have yourself a great day Snertking, good luck, and happy editing! :) -- WikHead (talk) 00:34, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Wurundjeri
Good going with the Wurundjeri vandalism! Scary to think it stood there for three days. SeoMac (talk) 01:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)