Jump to content

Talk:Naro Bible: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Oarabile Mudongo - "Language or Bible?: "
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
==Bible==
==Bible==
I have just realised the mistake now,seems like my research was based much on language not the Bible as i have intended to.Well maybe you can also help me fix up the article please [[User:Yakatz|Yakatz]] . <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Oarabile Mudongo|Oarabile Mudongo]] ([[User talk:Oarabile Mudongo|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Oarabile Mudongo|contribs]]) 10:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I have just realised the mistake now,seems like my research was based much on language not the Bible as i have intended to.Well maybe you can also help me fix up the article please [[User:Yakatz|Yakatz]] . <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Oarabile Mudongo|Oarabile Mudongo]] ([[User talk:Oarabile Mudongo|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Oarabile Mudongo|contribs]]) 10:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Deletion==
This article is horrendous, and I recommend it be brought to the attention of an administrator for deletion. It begins by copypasting the article on the language, and the remainder reads like it's from a Chrsitian Evangelical website, which is completely inappropriate for Wikipedia. People need to learn how to write in a style fitting for encyclopedias. [[Special:Contributions/64.179.181.61|64.179.181.61]] ([[User talk:64.179.181.61|talk]]) 00:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:55, 14 September 2013

Language or Bible?

This article title says it is about the Bible in this language, but then talks about the language itself. Maybe it should be changed to focus on the language and the bible can be a section. Yakatz (talk) 04:28, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bible

I have just realised the mistake now,seems like my research was based much on language not the Bible as i have intended to.Well maybe you can also help me fix up the article please Yakatz . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oarabile Mudongo (talkcontribs) 10:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

This article is horrendous, and I recommend it be brought to the attention of an administrator for deletion. It begins by copypasting the article on the language, and the remainder reads like it's from a Chrsitian Evangelical website, which is completely inappropriate for Wikipedia. People need to learn how to write in a style fitting for encyclopedias. 64.179.181.61 (talk) 00:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]