Talk:Managed services: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 201.87.1.71 - "" |
Katharine908 (talk | contribs) →==: questioned "offeree" in second paragraph |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The link http://www.itchanneldata.com/category/msp is broken. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/201.87.1.71|201.87.1.71]] ([[User talk:201.87.1.71|talk]]) 16:55, 8 August 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
The link http://www.itchanneldata.com/category/msp is broken. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/201.87.1.71|201.87.1.71]] ([[User talk:201.87.1.71|talk]]) 16:55, 8 August 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
================== |
|||
offeree/offerer. The second paragraph says "Typically, the offeree remains accountable for the functionality and performance." Nowhere in the article does it say who the offeree is. I assume that it's the managed services provider, since the client is the offerer. I'm not a subject matter expert (that's why I'm looking on Wikipedia), but it seems to me that it should be the ''offeror'' who remains accountable. Would appreciate clarification. [[User:Katharine908|Katharine908]] ([[User talk:Katharine908|talk]]) 16:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
================= |
|||
Revision as of 16:38, 18 September 2013
I would like to know more about managed service. Also,start will be preferred.
======
The link http://www.itchanneldata.com/category/msp is broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.87.1.71 (talk) 16:55, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
======
offeree/offerer. The second paragraph says "Typically, the offeree remains accountable for the functionality and performance." Nowhere in the article does it say who the offeree is. I assume that it's the managed services provider, since the client is the offerer. I'm not a subject matter expert (that's why I'm looking on Wikipedia), but it seems to me that it should be the offeror who remains accountable. Would appreciate clarification. Katharine908 (talk) 16:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)