Jump to content

Hemimotor neglect: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
m [458]Add: issue, pages, doi, pmid. Tweak: pages. Formatted dashes. | User-activated.
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AFC submission|t||ts=20131007203242|u=PiccioPaglio|ns=5}} <!--- Important, do not remove this line before article has been created. --->
{{AFC submission|t||ts=20131007203242|u=PiccioPaglio|ns=5}} <!--- Important, do not remove this line before article has been created. --->
Motor neglect is a term coined by Laplane and Degos <ref name="Laplan 1">{{cite journal|last=Laplane|first=D|coauthors=Degos, JD|title=Motor Neglect|journal=Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgical Psychiatry|year=1983|volume=46|doi=10.1136/jnnp.46.2.152|issue=2|pages=152}}</ref> and its refers to the underutilization of the affected upper and/or lower limb following brain damage.Motor neglect likes hemiplegia but a despite of this disease patients with motor neglect have no paresis, no increase in muscle tone,no alterations in sensation.


'''Motor Neglect''' is a neuropsychological condition, after damage to one hemisphere of the brain is occured, characterized by a failure spontaneous use more or less complete hemi-body in the absence of paralysis, pyramidal syndromes, extrapyramidal, strength and primary sensory deficit.
bla bla bla <ref name="Buxbaum 1">{{cite journal|last=Buxbaum|first=L.J.|coauthors=Ferraro, M.K., Veramonti, T., Farne, A., Whyte, J., Ladavas, E., Frassinetti, F., Coslett, H.B.|title=Hemispatial neglect: Subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability|journal=Neurology|year=2004|volume=62|issue=5|doi=10.1212/01.WNL.0000113730.73031.F4|pages=749–56|pmid=15007125}}</ref>


==Presentation==
bla bla bla comunque NON ESISTE <ref name="Sampanis 3">{{cite journal|last=Sampanis|first=D.S.|coauthors=Riddoch, J.|title=Motor Neglect and Future Directions for Research|journal=Frontiers Human Neuroscience|year=2013|volume=7|doi=10.3389/fnhum.2013.00110}}</ref>

The motor neglect has been described by different terms and a significant confusing exists: disorders and intentional neglect, motor hemineglect and thalamic, nonsensory neglect and callosal neglect.
Laplane and Degos conied term "motor negelct" and had given his definition:''"Absent or low use spontaneous contralesional limb (lower and / or higher), despite preserved motor skills and is not explained by weakness or lack of sensitivity, it improves with the verbal suggestion."''
The motor neglect can occur in isolation from the neglect, or in association making the syndromic picture more complicated at least in 30% of patients with brain damege.

=Clinical Features==

The motor neglect is concerns all proximal and distal movements, involving both the upper and lower limb is automatic gestures. The the taxonomy of symptoms of motor neglect are diverse: poor use of the limb for limb against lesional " healthy " in tasks that do not require it (such as when you request a change of position of the body); difficulty in bimanual activities (such as open a bottle); spontaneous gestures reduced especially during the speech, lack of "swing" of the arm while walking. The path is unbalanced, the lower limb is often dragged with the consequent risk of falls. The movements with the limb neglected, when executed, are initiated with delay [[(hypokinesia)]], reduced in their amplitude [[(ipometria)]], and accompanied by [[bradykinesia]]. One the most distinctive features of motor neglect is his verbal prompt. Specifically, patients with motor neglect have relatively normal movement when encouraged specifically to use the contralesional limb a but do not perform the same movement spontaneously.
Motor neglect is different from directional hypokinesia "motor neglect component",two forms of motor deficits that are associated with neglect, but that stand out from motor neglect. The directional hypokinesia refers to a deficit of startup of the movements with the limb ipsilesional contralesional space. These patients are slowed down when they have to perform an action with the limb not neglected in space account side, despite the control and motor coordination is preserved. The "motor neglect component" likes motor neglect, but that unlike the latter, it doesn't improve through direct verbal command, but only through vestibular stimulation.

==Causes==
Recently, two different proposals have been introduced to try to interpret the motor neglect. The first hypothesis sustained that motor neglect may be due to a deficit in the inhibition of automatic actions involving the right hand and his left hand. The primary motor cortex of patients with motor neglect fails to inhibit programming of the movements of the right hand. In practice, the planning of the left limb movement is disturbed from planning right limb, this produces a slowing of the movement of the limb left or the inability of the movement itself. This hypothesis was tested through the use of an experimental paradigm for the study of inhibitory control automatic. On the other hand motor neglect can be attributed to a disorder of intention motor.
==See Also==
==References==


==




Line 16: Line 27:




==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
<!--- After listing your sources please cite them using inline citations and place them after the information they cite. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REFB for instructions on how to add citations. --->
<!--- After listing your sources please cite them using inline citations and place them after the information they cite. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REFB for instructions on how to add citations. --->

Revision as of 12:08, 8 October 2013

Motor Neglect is a neuropsychological condition, after damage to one hemisphere of the brain is occured, characterized by a failure spontaneous use more or less complete hemi-body in the absence of paralysis, pyramidal syndromes, extrapyramidal, strength and primary sensory deficit.

Presentation

The motor neglect has been described by different terms and a significant confusing exists: disorders and intentional neglect, motor hemineglect and thalamic, nonsensory neglect and callosal neglect. Laplane and Degos conied term "motor negelct" and had given his definition:"Absent or low use spontaneous contralesional limb (lower and / or higher), despite preserved motor skills and is not explained by weakness or lack of sensitivity, it improves with the verbal suggestion." The motor neglect can occur in isolation from the neglect, or in association making the syndromic picture more complicated at least in 30% of patients with brain damege.

Clinical Features=

The motor neglect is concerns all proximal and distal movements, involving both the upper and lower limb is automatic gestures. The the taxonomy of symptoms of motor neglect are diverse: poor use of the limb for limb against lesional " healthy " in tasks that do not require it (such as when you request a change of position of the body); difficulty in bimanual activities (such as open a bottle); spontaneous gestures reduced especially during the speech, lack of "swing" of the arm while walking. The path is unbalanced, the lower limb is often dragged with the consequent risk of falls. The movements with the limb neglected, when executed, are initiated with delay (hypokinesia), reduced in their amplitude (ipometria), and accompanied by bradykinesia. One the most distinctive features of motor neglect is his verbal prompt. Specifically, patients with motor neglect have relatively normal movement when encouraged specifically to use the contralesional limb a but do not perform the same movement spontaneously. Motor neglect is different from directional hypokinesia "motor neglect component",two forms of motor deficits that are associated with neglect, but that stand out from motor neglect. The directional hypokinesia refers to a deficit of startup of the movements with the limb ipsilesional contralesional space. These patients are slowed down when they have to perform an action with the limb not neglected in space account side, despite the control and motor coordination is preserved. The "motor neglect component" likes motor neglect, but that unlike the latter, it doesn't improve through direct verbal command, but only through vestibular stimulation.

Causes

Recently, two different proposals have been introduced to try to interpret the motor neglect. The first hypothesis sustained that motor neglect may be due to a deficit in the inhibition of automatic actions involving the right hand and his left hand. The primary motor cortex of patients with motor neglect fails to inhibit programming of the movements of the right hand. In practice, the planning of the left limb movement is disturbed from planning right limb, this produces a slowing of the movement of the limb left or the inability of the movement itself. This hypothesis was tested through the use of an experimental paradigm for the study of inhibitory control automatic. On the other hand motor neglect can be attributed to a disorder of intention motor.

See Also

References