Jump to content

Talk:Yesterday: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
second paragraph
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


The second paragraph seems childish to me, like something a 10 year old would say to confuse his classmates. Also, I think that most people know how "yesterday" works, and that explaining day after, before, and so on is sort of irrelevant. I'm deleting it.
The second paragraph seems childish to me, like something a 10 year old would say to confuse his classmates. Also, I think that most people know how "yesterday" works, and that explaining day after, before, and so on is sort of irrelevant. I'm deleting it.
:I am sorry you feel that way, but ''I don't like it'' is no reason for reversion.

Revision as of 21:28, 10 June 2006

Redirect?

Johnleemk set a redirect from Talk:Yesterday to Talk:Yesterday (Song). I fail to see why the talk for a disambiguation page should redirect to one of the disambiguated pages. I'm removing it for now; should anyone disagree, please explain why you think this is needed. --Pathoschild 11:43, 28 September 2005

Just to clarify, that was a mix-up caused by the fact that Yesterday (song) used to reside at Yesterday. When I moved it, the talk page was moved also, and the software automatically set this talk page to redirect to the talk page of Yesterday (song). Johnleemk | Talk 16:01, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
All is explained then. Thanks. --Pathoschild 11:43, 28 September 2005

second paragraph

The second paragraph seems childish to me, like something a 10 year old would say to confuse his classmates. Also, I think that most people know how "yesterday" works, and that explaining day after, before, and so on is sort of irrelevant. I'm deleting it.

I am sorry you feel that way, but I don't like it is no reason for reversion.