Jump to content

Talk:KL-ONE: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m Removing talk page attribution templates per Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 January 18, Replaced: {{FOLDOC talk}} → using AWB
Mdebellis (talk | contribs)
Line 6: Line 6:


Let's remember this is an encyclopedia, not a technical manual. I'm glad someone made this article, but I'm also looking forward to the English version.
Let's remember this is an encyclopedia, not a technical manual. I'm glad someone made this article, but I'm also looking forward to the English version.

== Automatic Classification? ==

This article currently leaves out one of the most critical, in fact I would say the defining, capability of KL-ONE which is automatic classification. Rather than describing the subsumption (class-subclass) relations explicitly one can describe properties of the classes and a special type of reasoner called classifier can infer the class hierarchy. Or it can take a given class hierarchy and validate or extend it -- actually in my experience that is the more useful way to use it and the way actual users prefer to use it. [[User:Mdebellis|RedDog]] ([[User talk:Mdebellis|talk]]) 19:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:57, 7 December 2013

Can someone put what the correct pronunciation of KL-ONE is? Is it 'Kay-Ell-Won' or 'clone' or something else? --Ferris37 18:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, no trick to it. "Kay Ell 1" --BlueNovember 21:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

english

Let's remember this is an encyclopedia, not a technical manual. I'm glad someone made this article, but I'm also looking forward to the English version.

Automatic Classification?

This article currently leaves out one of the most critical, in fact I would say the defining, capability of KL-ONE which is automatic classification. Rather than describing the subsumption (class-subclass) relations explicitly one can describe properties of the classes and a special type of reasoner called classifier can infer the class hierarchy. Or it can take a given class hierarchy and validate or extend it -- actually in my experience that is the more useful way to use it and the way actual users prefer to use it. RedDog (talk) 19:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]