Jump to content

Talk:Benefits realisation management: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Line 5: Line 5:
== Advertisement tag ==
== Advertisement tag ==
The content needs to be expressed in an encyclopedic tone and should not be reliant on technical jargon. For example, "An investment is only successful if intended benefits are realised and BRM supports key choices and actions to achieve this success" could be better expressed as "BRM facilitates successful investments." The sentences "BRM has clear roles and responsibilities, processes, principles and deliverables that are common across investment types. Common investment types include procurement, projects, programmes, portfolios and in continuing business operations." has many overlapping terms and reads like a brochure.<br />Best Wishes <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:AnkhMorpork|<b><font color="#990000">Ankh</font></b>]]'''.'''[[User talk:AnkhMorpork|<font color="#000099">Morpork</font>]]'''</small> 19:56, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
The content needs to be expressed in an encyclopedic tone and should not be reliant on technical jargon. For example, "An investment is only successful if intended benefits are realised and BRM supports key choices and actions to achieve this success" could be better expressed as "BRM facilitates successful investments." The sentences "BRM has clear roles and responsibilities, processes, principles and deliverables that are common across investment types. Common investment types include procurement, projects, programmes, portfolios and in continuing business operations." has many overlapping terms and reads like a brochure.<br />Best Wishes <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:AnkhMorpork|<b><font color="#990000">Ankh</font></b>]]'''.'''[[User talk:AnkhMorpork|<font color="#000099">Morpork</font>]]'''</small> 19:56, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello: I agree that a clear tone of language is required - however, the current definition on this page is totally incorrect and can be improved greatly. I am happy to help do this, assuming inputs are welcome?


== Removing the advertising and sources tags ==
== Removing the advertising and sources tags ==

Revision as of 23:38, 19 December 2013

The content needs to be expressed in an encyclopedic tone and should not be reliant on technical jargon. For example, "An investment is only successful if intended benefits are realised and BRM supports key choices and actions to achieve this success" could be better expressed as "BRM facilitates successful investments." The sentences "BRM has clear roles and responsibilities, processes, principles and deliverables that are common across investment types. Common investment types include procurement, projects, programmes, portfolios and in continuing business operations." has many overlapping terms and reads like a brochure.
Best Wishes Ankh.Morpork 19:56, 18 April 2012 (UTC) Hello: I agree that a clear tone of language is required - however, the current definition on this page is totally incorrect and can be improved greatly. I am happy to help do this, assuming inputs are welcome?[reply]

Removing the advertising and sources tags

I'm attempting to clean up this page without removing too much of the original contributors meaning. I think the rephrasing and tidying up of the page so far probably merits the removal of those tags but if anyone thinks more needs to be done please let me know.

I'd like to add in a short discussion of each of the major methods of BRM as well, mainly because people get very het up over terms such as objective and benefit as they mean slightly different things within the methods. FMMonty (talk) 20:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC) This is a new topic of business only developed in recent years - for this reason there are few references other than the ones already mentioned on this page - we have an article that provides a detailed description of the topic, which would provide a lot more information (and background etc for readers) as an external reference - the page is here: www.pmis.co.uk/benefits_realisation.htm - would be happy to add this as a reference if others agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktlonergan (talkcontribs) 10:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]