Jump to content

Talk:History of cancer chemotherapy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mxpule (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mxpule (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
It was deliberate. There are very few articles with concluding remarks, and skimming over it I could not find anything that hadn't been covered in the article. But please leave it in if you prefer. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 4 July 2005 16:37 (UTC)
It was deliberate. There are very few articles with concluding remarks, and skimming over it I could not find anything that hadn't been covered in the article. But please leave it in if you prefer. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 4 July 2005 16:37 (UTC)


What happened to the pictures of all the doctors involved? I thought they were very interesting. Matt 16:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC). They are all US government material but wikipedia keeps on deleting them - very irritating [[user:mxpule]].
What happened to the pictures of all the doctors involved? I thought they were very interesting. Matt 16:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC).
:They are all US government material but wikipedia keeps on deleting them - very irritating [[user:mxpule]].[[User:Mxpule|Mxpule]] 23:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


:They had no source. If Mxpule could find PD/fair use imaged we'd be grateful. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 21:55, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
:They had no source. If Mxpule could find PD/fair use imaged we'd be grateful. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 21:55, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Line 12: Line 13:
:I can't really understand this comment. It is about the history of cancer chemotherapy!!!! What did you expect - a history of cancer hypnotherapy or aromatherapy? I put into the text when cancers were cured. Choriocarcinoma and Hodgkins lymphoma were universally fatal diseases before chemotherapy - what more "relative success" do you want? Have you even read the article? [[User:Mxpule|Mxpule]] 23:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[[user:mxpule]]
:I can't really understand this comment. It is about the history of cancer chemotherapy!!!! What did you expect - a history of cancer hypnotherapy or aromatherapy? I put into the text when cancers were cured. Choriocarcinoma and Hodgkins lymphoma were universally fatal diseases before chemotherapy - what more "relative success" do you want? Have you even read the article? [[User:Mxpule|Mxpule]] 23:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[[user:mxpule]]


This article mentions "the genetic nature of cancer" as a Scientific Truth, when there's evidence that seems to disprove that argument ( http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2006/4/prweb375398.php ). Please consider and make the following corrections, if warranted. [[User:Denvr|Denvr]] 15:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC). What planet are you from??? Cancer is caused by somatic genetic mutations, why do I even bother [[User:Mxpule|Mxpule]] 23:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[[user:mxpule]]
This article mentions "the genetic nature of cancer" as a Scientific Truth, when there's evidence that seems to disprove that argument ( http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2006/4/prweb375398.php ). Please consider and make the following corrections, if warranted. [[User:Denvr|Denvr]] 15:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC).
:What planet are you from??? Cancer is largely caused by somatic genetic mutations, [[User:Mxpule|Mxpule]] 23:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[[user:mxpule]]

Revision as of 23:38, 16 June 2006

This very good article needed some copyediting. I have lowercased all drug names that are not brand names, and similarly all diseases apart from the eponymous ones are lowercased on Wikipedia. I have also formatted the references, added PMIDs, and added categories. JFW | T@lk 4 July 2005 14:45 (UTC)

You may have removed my concluding comments by accident while correcting the references. Without this conclusion, this article becomes rather superficial and rings hollow. Combination chemotherapy has in some ways been a tremendous failure - this is not a matter of opinion but solid scientific fact and this should be brought out in a conclusion. MXPULE 4th July 2005 London.

It was deliberate. There are very few articles with concluding remarks, and skimming over it I could not find anything that hadn't been covered in the article. But please leave it in if you prefer. JFW | T@lk 4 July 2005 16:37 (UTC)

What happened to the pictures of all the doctors involved? I thought they were very interesting. Matt 16:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC).

They are all US government material but wikipedia keeps on deleting them - very irritating user:mxpule.Mxpule 23:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
They had no source. If Mxpule could find PD/fair use imaged we'd be grateful. JFW | T@lk 21:55, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not happy with this page. The history of chemotherapy implies a little history of the therapy, and this reads more like a history of chemo. I would like to see some conclusions about the relative success of the original treatment regimens. Otherwise, what's there to show that any of it helped at all?Jane 13:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I can't really understand this comment. It is about the history of cancer chemotherapy!!!! What did you expect - a history of cancer hypnotherapy or aromatherapy? I put into the text when cancers were cured. Choriocarcinoma and Hodgkins lymphoma were universally fatal diseases before chemotherapy - what more "relative success" do you want? Have you even read the article? Mxpule 23:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)user:mxpule[reply]

This article mentions "the genetic nature of cancer" as a Scientific Truth, when there's evidence that seems to disprove that argument ( http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2006/4/prweb375398.php ). Please consider and make the following corrections, if warranted. Denvr 15:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

What planet are you from??? Cancer is largely caused by somatic genetic mutations, Mxpule 23:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)user:mxpule[reply]