Jump to content

Is the Holocaust Unique?: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Antidotto (talk | contribs)
207 edits
politics surrounding the book
Antidotto (talk | contribs)
207 edits
m italics
Line 30: Line 30:
==Politics of Editing the Book==
==Politics of Editing the Book==
Ward Churchill writes:<ref>Ward Churchill, 'A Little Matter of Genocide', CityLights Books, 1997</ref>
Ward Churchill writes:<ref>Ward Churchill, 'A Little Matter of Genocide', CityLights Books, 1997</ref>
:An excellent topical example of what is at issue is described in a recent article by Christopher Shea in the Chronicle of Higher Education<ref>[[Christopher Shea]], "The Debate Over the Uniqueness of the Holocaust," Chronicle of Higher Education, 13 September 1996.</ref> concerning the controversy attending preparation of a Westview Press collection, Is the Holocaust Unique? Perspectives in Comparative Genocide, a book which was supposed to be a free and open exchange between those holding to exclusivist principles and scholars expressing comparativist views. As Shea observes, the problem devolves upon the fact that volume editor [[Alan S. Rosenbaum]] provided advance copies of all submissions to one contributor -- and only one -- Cornell University professor [[Steven T. Katz]], author of the massive three-volume Holocaust in Historical Context and a leading advocate of exclusivism in its pure form.<br>Upon reviewing what some comparativists had to say with respect to his work, Katz whipped off a laundry list of changes and deletion he wanted to see made to their critiques. Rosenbaum in turn fronted these "suggestions" as if they were his own. Only when the editor accidentally faxed a memo intended for Katz to one of the more trenchant critics, historian [[David E. Stannard]], was the subterfuge revealed (the missive outlined various contributors' compliance with Katz's secret manipulations). After a series of meetings with the publisher and its lawyers, most of the essays were returned to their original form -- a matter Katz, apparently waxing indignant at having been caught calls "a disgraceful business" -- and the book was sent to the press.
:An excellent topical example of what is at issue is described in a recent article by Christopher Shea in the Chronicle of Higher Education<ref>[[Christopher Shea]], "The Debate Over the Uniqueness of the Holocaust," 'Chronicle of Higher Education', 13 September 1996.</ref> concerning the controversy attending preparation of a Westview Press collection, 'Is the Holocaust Unique? Perspectives in Comparative Genocide', a book which was supposed to be a free and open exchange between those holding to exclusivist principles and scholars expressing comparativist views. As Shea observes, the problem devolves upon the fact that volume editor [[Alan S. Rosenbaum]] provided advance copies of all submissions to one contributor -- and only one -- Cornell University professor [[Steven T. Katz]], author of the massive three-volume Holocaust in Historical Context and a leading advocate of exclusivism in its pure form.<br>Upon reviewing what some comparativists had to say with respect to his work, Katz whipped off a laundry list of changes and deletion he wanted to see made to their critiques. Rosenbaum in turn fronted these "suggestions" as if they were his own. Only when the editor accidentally faxed a memo intended for Katz to one of the more trenchant critics, historian [[David E. Stannard]], was the subterfuge revealed (the missive outlined various contributors' compliance with Katz's secret manipulations). After a series of meetings with the publisher and its lawyers, most of the essays were returned to their original form -- a matter Katz, apparently waxing indignant at having been caught calls "a disgraceful business" -- and the book was sent to the press.


==Reception==
==Reception==

Revision as of 02:45, 16 January 2014

Is the Holocaust Unique?: Perspectives on Comparative Genocide
Cover
AuthorAlan S. Rosenbaum
PublisherWestview Press
Publication date
1995, 2000 (reprinted)
Media typePaperback
Pages288
ISBN0-8133-3686-4
OCLC45024496
940.53/18/072 21
LC ClassD804.348 .I8 2001

Is the Holocaust Unique?: Perspectives on Comparative Genocide is a 1995 book edited by Alan S Rosenbaum. In the book, scholars compare the Holocaust to other well-known instances of genocide and mass death. The book asks, are there any historical parallels to the Jewish Holocaust? Have Armenians, Gypsies, American Indians, or others undergone a comparable genocide?

As Alan Rosenbaum stated in regards to the book, "Any attempt by any group to keep a monopoly on language is doomed to failure...Because anybody can use any language they want. And the term Holocaust has such power -- as the paradigm case of genocide -- that any group wanting to make a superlative case for its own experience would naturally want to borrow it."[1]

A second edition was printed in 2000, with a third edition to be released in 2009.[2]

Politics of Editing the Book

Ward Churchill writes:[3]

An excellent topical example of what is at issue is described in a recent article by Christopher Shea in the Chronicle of Higher Education[4] concerning the controversy attending preparation of a Westview Press collection, 'Is the Holocaust Unique? Perspectives in Comparative Genocide', a book which was supposed to be a free and open exchange between those holding to exclusivist principles and scholars expressing comparativist views. As Shea observes, the problem devolves upon the fact that volume editor Alan S. Rosenbaum provided advance copies of all submissions to one contributor -- and only one -- Cornell University professor Steven T. Katz, author of the massive three-volume Holocaust in Historical Context and a leading advocate of exclusivism in its pure form.
Upon reviewing what some comparativists had to say with respect to his work, Katz whipped off a laundry list of changes and deletion he wanted to see made to their critiques. Rosenbaum in turn fronted these "suggestions" as if they were his own. Only when the editor accidentally faxed a memo intended for Katz to one of the more trenchant critics, historian David E. Stannard, was the subterfuge revealed (the missive outlined various contributors' compliance with Katz's secret manipulations). After a series of meetings with the publisher and its lawyers, most of the essays were returned to their original form -- a matter Katz, apparently waxing indignant at having been caught calls "a disgraceful business" -- and the book was sent to the press.

Reception

Jewish Book World called the book "a thought-provoking inquiry into the Holocaust."

Authors

From the 2009, 3rd edition:[2]

Notes

  1. ^ Freedman, Samuel G. (December 13, 2008). "Laying Claim to Sorrow Beyond Words". The New York Times.
  2. ^ a b "Is the Holocaust Unique?: Perspectives on Comparative Genocide". tesco.com. Retrieved 2008-05-05. Official sponsor of Westview Press book sales.
  3. ^ Ward Churchill, 'A Little Matter of Genocide', CityLights Books, 1997
  4. ^ Christopher Shea, "The Debate Over the Uniqueness of the Holocaust," 'Chronicle of Higher Education', 13 September 1996.


Stub icon

This article about a political book is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Is_the_Holocaust_Unique%3F&oldid=590913153"