Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SILO: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
DrunkenSmurf (talk | contribs) m →[[SILO]]: weak keep, article needs work though |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Non-notable. Advert. [[User:BlueValour|BlueValour]] 22:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Non-notable. Advert. [[User:BlueValour|BlueValour]] 22:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Week Keep''' The article does read like an advert but the company IMO does appear to meet [[WP:CORP]] as I can find at least three reviews of the product easily with a simple google search. (The Macworld review is also a source link on the article itself and clearly is non-trivial.)Perhaps we can give the the creator of the article some time to make the content less like an advert. [[User:DrunkenSmurf|DrunkenSmurf]] 00:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Week Keep''' The article does read like an advert but the company IMO does appear to meet [[WP:CORP]] as I can find at least three reviews of the product easily with a simple google search. (The Macworld review is also a source link on the article itself and clearly is non-trivial.)Perhaps we can give the the creator of the article some time to make the content less like an advert. [[User:DrunkenSmurf|DrunkenSmurf]] 00:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Week Keep''' There are many reviews of Silo in major magazines, it is a legitimate 3d modeling tool. I will edit it to make it less like an advertisement and more factually accurate. [[User:DrunkenSmurf|DrunkenSmurf]] 00:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:08, 17 June 2006
SILO
Contested prod. Advertisement. Not particularly notable. Morgan Wick 22:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable. Advert. BlueValour 22:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Week Keep The article does read like an advert but the company IMO does appear to meet WP:CORP as I can find at least three reviews of the product easily with a simple google search. (The Macworld review is also a source link on the article itself and clearly is non-trivial.)Perhaps we can give the the creator of the article some time to make the content less like an advert. DrunkenSmurf 00:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Week Keep There are many reviews of Silo in major magazines, it is a legitimate 3d modeling tool. I will edit it to make it less like an advertisement and more factually accurate. DrunkenSmurf 00:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)