Talk:Lineage markers: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
create using AWB |
→Clarification of "mature haematopoietic cells": new section |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WPMED|class=Stub|importance=Low}} |
{{WPMED|class=Stub|importance=Low}} |
||
== Clarification of "mature haematopoietic cells" == |
|||
While the lineage cocktail certainly removes "classical" mature haematopoietic cells, there are some cells which are lineage negative and yet mature, such as the [[Nuocyte]] (which incidentally should probably be merged with the section on Type II Innate Lymphoid Cells, as they are synonymous). Therefore, is the current phrasing appropriate? [[User:Equisetum|Equisetum]]<small> ([[User talk:Equisetum|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Equisetum|contributions]])</small> 18:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:15, 20 January 2014
Medicine Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Clarification of "mature haematopoietic cells"
While the lineage cocktail certainly removes "classical" mature haematopoietic cells, there are some cells which are lineage negative and yet mature, such as the Nuocyte (which incidentally should probably be merged with the section on Type II Innate Lymphoid Cells, as they are synonymous). Therefore, is the current phrasing appropriate? Equisetum (talk | contributions) 18:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)