Talk:Qutbi Bohra: Difference between revisions
→Contested deletion: new section |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
This page should not be speedily deleted because... all that is written is true |
This page should not be speedily deleted because... all that is written is true |
||
== Contested deletion == |
|||
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --[[Special:Contributions/65.255.37.220|65.255.37.220]] ([[User talk:65.255.37.220|talk]]) 12:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:34, 4 February 2014
This page is misleading as there is nothing like Qutbi Bohra . This name is used to defame a split of group. The links given have no evidence . Most of the links are forum discussion hence delete the article.
Answer: As mentioned in the article the Qutbi Bohra was not a publically declared sect, the reasons for the same are also mentioned in the article.
But it is not true that it is misleading. it is not only mentioned in forum discussion but also in prominent newspapers: 1) Hindustan Times: April 15 2013. 2) Indian Express: Jan 20 2014.
On prominent websites: 1) www.muslimnews.co.uk:April 16 2013 2) www.newageislam.com: April 15 2013 3) en.cyclopaedia.net/wiki/Qutbi 4) peeepl.co.uk 5) in azad54.pdf a publication of progressive dawoodi bohra which is available on the site www.dawoodi-bohras.org.uk, (if possible please upload the same in reference) where it is mentioned in detail.
Would these evidence be enough?
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Araz5152 (talk • contribs) 10:35, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... all that is written is true
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --65.255.37.220 (talk) 12:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)