User talk:Jak Fisher: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jak Fisher (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jak Fisher (talk | contribs) ←Blanked the page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
y source. Maybe you can provide one, because from what I've gathered from my daily video game newsfeed, there still is no new game in development. Unless a reliable source can be added, that is either [[WP:OR]] or [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. --[[User:Soetermans|Soetermans]]. [[User talk: Soetermans|'''T''']] / [[Special:Contributions/Soetermans|'''C''']] 03:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I could be mistaken, but gathering from your contributions, it seems you must've seen my message. Could you take the time to respond? Thanks. --[[User:Soetermans|Soetermans]]. [[User talk: Soetermans|'''T''']] / [[Special:Contributions/Soetermans|'''C''']] 08:07, 21 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Hi Soetermans, sorry about that, I didn't safe my reply correctly the first time it seems. From what I can recall there was a discussion in the talk page referring to the matter, as there were several IP addressees that kept changing it. A similar think was happening on the Crash Bandicoot page as well; so no, I'm not referring to the one IP you have mentioned. I just glimpsed through the Jak and Daxter Talk Page and it isn't present, so I assume it most have been archived. As for the relevance of Naughty Dog, I suppose you do have a fair point, I was simply going by the consensus reached in the discussion, but that was a little while ago so it may not be that relevant to the here and now, and yes, there are no sources to prove there is another game in development so I don't really have a problem with it being changed. Sorry for the hassle and thanks for the message. - [[User:Jak Fisher|Jak Fisher]] ([[User talk:Jak Fisher|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jak Fisher|contribs]]) 11:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks for your reply, Jak Fisher. I'm glad it was just a misunderstanding. I think that it was wishful thinking and some crystalballing by that IP that keeps changing it to "present" (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naughty_Dog&diff=583816108&oldid=583776023 diff], "Also, might I add, they will be working on a Jak 4 soon, if they aren't already."). I've changed it back to 'present'. On a sidenote, though I would love to see another ''J&D'' game, I don't think it seems likely in the near future. Naughty Dog is still working on ''The Last of Us'' DLC, and another ''Uncharted'' entry has been announced for the PS4. But who knows! Thanks, and happy editing. --[[User:Soetermans|Soetermans]]. [[User talk: Soetermans|'''T''']] / [[Special:Contributions/Soetermans|'''C''']] 12:04, 21 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== December 2013 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=587098027 your edit] to [[The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page]. |
|||
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: |
|||
*<nowiki>| title=The Hobbit Worldwide Release Dates|publisher=TheHobbit.com|accessdate=December 21, 2013</nowiki>{{red|'''}'''}}<nowiki></ref> The film has grossed over $1 billion at the box office, [[List of highest-grossing films|</nowiki> |
|||
Thanks, <!-- (0, 0, -1, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 14:27, 21 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=587168003 your edit] to [[The Hobbit (film series)]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:The Hobbit (film series)|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page]. |
|||
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: |
|||
*<nowiki>of ''[[The Lord of the Rings]]''. They tell the tale of home-loving [[hobbit]] [[Bilbo Baggins]] </nowiki>{{red|'''('''}}<nowiki>[[Martin Freeman]], who is convinced by the [[Wizard (Middle-earth)|wizard]] [[Gandalf the Grey]] ([</nowiki> |
|||
Thanks, <!-- (1, 2, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 01:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Ratchet & Clank reverted because of an old revision used. == |
|||
Hi! I've just noticed you've gone back to an old revision edit of the Ratchet & Clank article, which is out of date and confusing to article editors and readers. It has been reverted for now until you explain in the talk page (not this one I'm on right now.) [[Special:Contributions/86.133.108.18|86.133.108.18]] ([[User talk:86.133.108.18|talk]]) 11:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:What are you referring to? You haven't mentioned the edit made, and yet you can speak for everyone that it is out of date and confusing when you haven't brought it up in the talk page yourself. Explain yourself better. - [[User:Jak Fisher|Jak Fisher]] ([[User talk:Jak Fisher|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jak Fisher|contribs]]) 12:10, 02 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::I already have explained this. 4 October 2013 (old revision) - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ratchet_%26_Clank&oldid=575682853] And I said the talk page on the Ratchet & Clank article (Not mine). [[Special:Contributions/86.133.108.18|86.133.108.18]] ([[User talk:86.133.108.18|talk]]) 12:15, 2 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:::The revision you are referring from October 4th is ''Into the Nexus'' which has nothing to do with the layout of the game section, and there is no edit summery provided so it could mean anything. Now to get to the point. You say it is confusing readers and editors and yet not you or anyone else have brought it up on the articles Talk Page. Secondly, this is the accepted method and is used on most articles, in fact it is supposed to be used as per wikipedia editing guidelines, that is why they provide us with the template. And by the way you can't argue that if other articles do it do it this way that you can as that is also against wikipedia editing guidelines. Thirdly, the critical reception isn't allowed where you have put it. This has been a matter for discussion on the video game Talk Page and the consensus reached is simply that it shouldn't be done like this as it unsightly and confusing. This point was also made for the Sly Cooper page which has a similar problem. Now I can appreciate where your coming from but the manner in which you have gone about this has been very unruly, disruptive and somewhat inappropriate. If this continues I will have to report you to be blocked. This is not a threat, it is simply what will happen if there isn't a bit more polite cooperation on your part i.e Don't tell editors to explain themselves and dictate where they do it. Don't delete message that have been left on your Talk Page. Do not leave a statement on the articles Talk Page saying you oppose and then revert the edits. The Talk Page is where you discuss the matter and reach a consensus, not dictate what you think without a valid reason (The ones you have provided aren't) and have the editors explain themselves to you. In other words [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]]. These are only a few examples and I suggest you read Wikiepdias rules and guidelines on editing before you respond. - Jak Fisher (talk • contribs) 12:50, 02 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||