Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hamelmelaga: Difference between revisions
→07 February 2014: adding more inf// |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
Hi there |
|||
Sorry if I have acted wrong unintentionally not being a Wikipedia expert. |
|||
I tried to edit the entry (did not try to vandalize) |
|||
When it failed several times (I now understand that it did not fail but that my "edit" was reversed) I thought there was a problem with my account and used another one. I was not aware of the prohibition to use multiple accounts and will not do so in the future. I am happy to cancel either of the accounts and apologize for not understanding the rules. |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
Revision as of 12:52, 7 February 2014
Hamelmelaga
- Hamelmelaga (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
07 February 2014
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Hamelmel (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
User:Hamelmelaga is possibly a sockpuppet of the User:Hamelmel meant to vandalize Idan Raichel article. Article's history AnupMehra ✈ 12:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Hi there Sorry if I have acted wrong unintentionally not being a Wikipedia expert. I tried to edit the entry (did not try to vandalize) When it failed several times (I now understand that it did not fail but that my "edit" was reversed) I thought there was a problem with my account and used another one. I was not aware of the prohibition to use multiple accounts and will not do so in the future. I am happy to cancel either of the accounts and apologize for not understanding the rules.