Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sellstate: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:58, 22 June 2006

Sellstate

Potential Spam (Which has been changed):Original reason for deletion was Spam - edited to potential spam by voter User:DaveOMac Original reason for deletion was Spam - edited by first time voter User:Sellstate

Strong Keep I don't understand why there is such a need to delete this article it's been corrected and no longer reads as spam. As long as the article stays unbias, I see no reason to delete it. If the first time user was a violator, then perhaps a warning to him should be sent. The original author of this article has also apparently tried to delete it.
Keep This article has been changed to have a more opinionated feel and no longer has any mention from the CEO
Strong Delete as per my nom. Dlyons493 Talk 21:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an ad (the following are things to keep in mind - if the page contains contact details, a signature block of a CEO or manager, full of value-laden happy adjectives or clichés such as 'revolutionary', 'dynamic' &c, a list of products or services or a menu, an operating history that is described in anyway as being 'proud' or all American/suitable nationality-owned, &c). Basically see WP:NOT and WP:NPOV (is there a specific advertising guideline/proposal?) Jammo (SM247) 23:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable corporation. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-06-22 08:07Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===[[Sellstate]]===
 Potential Spam (Which has been changed):Original reason for deletion was '''Spam''' - edited to potential spam by voter [[User:DaveOMac]]
+Original reason for deletion was '''Spam''' - edited by first time voter [[User:Sellstate]]
 *'''Strong Keep''' I don't understand why there is such a need to delete this article it's been corrected and no longer reads as spam. As long as the article stays unbias, I see no reason to delete it. If the first time user was a violator, then perhaps a warning to him should be sent. The original author of this article has also apparently tried to delete it.
 *'''Keep''' This article has been changed to have a more opinionated feel and no longer has any mention from the CEO
 *'''Strong Delete''' as per my nom.  [[User:Dlyons493|<FONT COLOR="#00FF00">Dl</FONT><FONT COLOR="#44FF00">yo</FONT><FONT COLOR="#99DD11">ns</FONT><FONT COLOR="#DDDD11">493</FONT>]] [[User_talk:Dlyons493|<FONT COLOR="#DDDD11">Ta</FONT><FONT COLOR="#00FF00">lk</FONT>]] 21:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
-Original reason for deletion was '''Spam''' - edited by first time voter [[User:Sellstate]]
 *'''Delete''' as an ad (the following are things to keep in mind - if the page contains contact details, a signature block of a CEO or manager, full of value-laden happy adjectives or clichés such as 'revolutionary', 'dynamic' &c, a list of products or services or a menu, an operating history that is described in anyway as being 'proud' or all American/suitable nationality-owned, &c). Basically see [[WP:NOT]] and [[WP:NPOV]] (is there a specific advertising guideline/proposal?) [[User:SM247|Jammo (SM247)]] 23:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * '''Delete''' as [[WP:CORP|non-notable corporation]]. <span class="user-sig user-Quarl"><i>—[[User:Quarl|Quarl]] <sup>([[User Talk:Quarl|talk]])</sup> <small>[[2006-06-22]] 08:07Z</small></i></span>