User talk:Nymf: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by Iamtheone21 (talk) to last version by Nymf |
Iamtheone21 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{/Header}} |
|||
==Your revert at [[Emma Watson]]== |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
For what it's worth, I think details like [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emma_Watson&diff=600662504&oldid=600660214 this], used sporadically, make article subjects more human. —[[User:ATinySliver|<span style="font-family:times; font-size:15px; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px">ATinySliver</span>]]<b>/</b>[[User talk:ATinySliver|<span style="font-family:times; color:#070; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px"><sup>ATalkPage</sup></span>]] 19:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC) |
|||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 70K |
|||
|counter = 5 |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
|algo = old(7d) |
|||
|archive = User talk:Nymf/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Archive box| |
|||
[[User talk:Nymf/Archive 1|Archive 1 (2008-9)]] {{*}} |
|||
[[User talk:Nymf/Archive 2|Archive 2 (2010)]] </br> |
|||
[[User talk:Nymf/Archive 3|Archive 3 (2011)]] {{*}} |
|||
[[User talk:Nymf/Archive 4|Archive 4 (2012)]] |
|||
}} |
|||
Hello Nymph we love that you contribute to Wiki however it has come to my attention from your recent edit on Brad Pitt's page that you had made unconstructive edits and reverted edits that weren't yours without permission. It is for that reason that you are being blocked for 2 weeks from making edits. We would love for you to continue being a productive contributor to the Wiki community as soon as 2 weeks are over. We highly advise that you contact the editor before making any reverts, because doing otherwise is rude. |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''Two weeks''' for persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 07:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> |
|||
==Your revert at [[Cate Blanchett]]== |
==Your revert at [[Cate Blanchett]]== |
||
Revision as of 23:16, 29 March 2014
Boring.
|
Archive 1 (2008-9) •
Archive 2 (2010) |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Boring.
|
Archive 1 (2008-9) •
Archive 2 (2010) |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hello Nymph we love that you contribute to Wiki however it has come to my attention from your recent edit on Brad Pitt's page that you had made unconstructive edits and reverted edits that weren't yours without permission. It is for that reason that you are being blocked for 2 weeks from making edits. We would love for you to continue being a productive contributor to the Wiki community as soon as 2 weeks are over. We highly advise that you contact the editor before making any reverts, because doing otherwise is rude.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bgwhite (talk) 07:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Your revert at Cate Blanchett
The Best Picture Oscar is an award for the film's overall merits and an actor will always affect a film's quality. It is clear that a film such as "Elizabeth" would not have gotten close to the nomination if it hadn't been for the acclaim for the central performance. Thusly, I believe placing under parenthesis what Best Picture nominees an actor/actress has been in a) helps a reader who is searching for films to watch from the Actor/Actress b) is an appropriate merit-based assessment of his/her work Simon824 (talk) 19:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)