Talk:Stratum lucidum of hippocampus: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
secondary review |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
'''Secondary Review''': |
'''Secondary Review''': |
||
I think you definitely have a good start-this topic seems to be somewhat obscure and highly specific. My primary suggestion is to fix the citations and add citations to the “interneurons” and “mossy fibers” sections. Particularly in the mossy fibers area where you have two different sources it is essential to show which information is from which source. Additionally, I can see why you put information about the stratum pyramidal and stratum radiatum since there are no articles for these areas: however, I think these should not be under the composition section because the stratum lucidum is not composed of this. You could perhaps add this to the location section. I do not know how much information is available about the stratum lucidum function, but if there is more this would definitely be an area to expand on.[[User:Iutschig|Iutschig]] ([[User talk:Iutschig|talk]]) 21:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC) |
I think you definitely have a good start-this topic seems to be somewhat obscure and highly specific. My primary suggestion is to fix the citations and add citations to the “interneurons” and “mossy fibers” sections. Particularly in the mossy fibers area where you have two different sources it is essential to show which information is from which source. Additionally, I can see why you put information about the stratum pyramidal and stratum radiatum since there are no articles for these areas: however, I think these should not be under the composition section because the stratum lucidum is not composed of this. You could perhaps add this to the location section. I do not know how much information is available about the stratum lucidum function, but if there is more this would definitely be an area to expand on.[[User:Iutschig|Iutschig]] ([[User talk:Iutschig|talk]]) 21:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
===Secondary Review=== |
|||
The article does a good job of explaining things so that it is easy to understand, which is good especially since this article is in a widely used online encyclopedia. It would be good if you could find a picture to include with the article as a thumbnail, though I'm sure it is hard to find on wikimedia. The stratum pyramidile and the stratum raiatum that you linked don't exist on wikipedia so they show up red. You can just unlink them in the article and it'll look better. Also, there were quotes in some of the sections which didn't seem like they needed to be quoted. If it is a direct quote from a source then you should cite it in the same sentence, but since they were usually only a few words I feel like you can go without the quotes by rewording and putting a citation lnk at the end. In all very good. [[User:Awesomepossum12|Awesomepossum12]] ([[User talk:Awesomepossum12|talk]]) 00:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:46, 5 April 2014
 | Medicine Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment. |
This topic is being edited as an assignment in an undergraduate neurobiology course. The course is participating in the Wikipedia Education Program.
Secondary Review: I think you definitely have a good start-this topic seems to be somewhat obscure and highly specific. My primary suggestion is to fix the citations and add citations to the “interneurons” and “mossy fibers” sections. Particularly in the mossy fibers area where you have two different sources it is essential to show which information is from which source. Additionally, I can see why you put information about the stratum pyramidal and stratum radiatum since there are no articles for these areas: however, I think these should not be under the composition section because the stratum lucidum is not composed of this. You could perhaps add this to the location section. I do not know how much information is available about the stratum lucidum function, but if there is more this would definitely be an area to expand on.Iutschig (talk) 21:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Secondary Review
The article does a good job of explaining things so that it is easy to understand, which is good especially since this article is in a widely used online encyclopedia. It would be good if you could find a picture to include with the article as a thumbnail, though I'm sure it is hard to find on wikimedia. The stratum pyramidile and the stratum raiatum that you linked don't exist on wikipedia so they show up red. You can just unlink them in the article and it'll look better. Also, there were quotes in some of the sections which didn't seem like they needed to be quoted. If it is a direct quote from a source then you should cite it in the same sentence, but since they were usually only a few words I feel like you can go without the quotes by rewording and putting a citation lnk at the end. In all very good. Awesomepossum12 (talk) 00:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)