File talk:Pro-russia-protests.png: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:01, 8 April 2014

Violation of Neutral POV

1) Crimean status should not be described as "military occupation" 2) The numbers of protesters should be rechecked 3) The protests in Kherson Oblast' were once again not included 4) The author of this picture should set aside his anti-Russian biases (although I appreciate you ivesting your time into this)

- agree the Crimean people hold a referendum all what russia did was holding ukrainian forces under control to not interfere this process.--Crossswords (talk) 13:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, 1) Crimean status is not "military occupation", but de facto controll, annexed by Russia

Revision as of 13:18, 2 April 2014 edit Crossswords (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,686 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:01, 8 April 2014 edit undo 83.17.84.82 (talk) Crimea Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	- agree the Crimean people hold a referendum all what russia did was holding ukrainian forces under control to not interfere this process.--[[User:Crossswords\|Crossswords]] ([[User talk:Crossswords\|talk]]) 13:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)		- agree the Crimean people hold a referendum all what russia did was holding ukrainian forces under control to not interfere this process.--[[User:Crossswords\|Crossswords]] ([[User talk:Crossswords\|talk]]) 13:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

			: Yes, 1) Crimean status is not "military occupation", but de facto controll, annexed by Russia