Jump to content

Constructive fraud: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m WP:CHECKWIKI error #61 fixed + general fixes using AWB (8884)
fix redundancy
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Constructive fraud''' is a [[legal fiction]] used in the [[law]] to describe a situation where a person or entity gained an unfair advantage over another by deceitful, or unfair, methods. [[intent (law)|Intent]] does not need to be shown<ref name=MT>{{cite web
'''Constructive fraud''' is a [[legal fiction]] to describe a situation where a person or entity gained an unfair advantage over another by deceitful or unfair methods. [[intent (law)|Intent]] does not need to be shown<ref name=MT>{{cite web
| title = Montana Code Annotated
| title = Montana Code Annotated
| url=http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/mca/28/2/28-2-406.htm
| url=http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/mca/28/2/28-2-406.htm

Revision as of 08:40, 9 April 2014

Constructive fraud is a legal fiction to describe a situation where a person or entity gained an unfair advantage over another by deceitful or unfair methods. Intent does not need to be shown[1] as in the case of actual fraud. Some unfair methods may include not telling customers about defects in a product.[2]

The elements are:[3]

  1. a duty owing by the party to be charged to the complaining party due to their relationship;[4]
  2. violation of that duty by the making of deceptive material misrepresentations of past or existing facts or remaining silent when a duty to speak exists;
  3. reliance thereon by the complaining party;
  4. injury to the complaining party as a proximate result thereof; and
  5. the gaining of an advantage by the party to be charged at the expense of the complaining party.

References

  1. ^ "Montana Code Annotated". Retrieved 2009-03-10.
  2. ^ "Law.com Dictionary". Retrieved 2009-03-10.
  3. ^ Strong v. Jackson, 777 N.E. 2d 1141 (2002).
  4. ^ A fiduciary duty is one such duty Sees v Bank One, footnote 8, page 3