Jump to content

Surface finish: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Xerti (talk | contribs)
m external guide explaining ISO specifications for the assessment of surface finish + complements
Line 21: Line 21:
Surface finish may be measured in two ways: ''contact'' and ''non-contact'' methods. Contact methods involve dragging a measurement [[stylus]] across the surface; these instruments are called [[profilometer]]s. Non-contact methods include: [[interferometry]], [[confocal microscopy]], [[focus variation]], [[structured light]], [[electrical capacitance]], [[electron microscopy]], and [[photogrammetry]].
Surface finish may be measured in two ways: ''contact'' and ''non-contact'' methods. Contact methods involve dragging a measurement [[stylus]] across the surface; these instruments are called [[profilometer]]s. Non-contact methods include: [[interferometry]], [[confocal microscopy]], [[focus variation]], [[structured light]], [[electrical capacitance]], [[electron microscopy]], and [[photogrammetry]].


The most common method is to use a [[diamond]] stylus [[profilometer]]. The stylus is run perpendicular to the lay of the surface.<ref name="degarmo223"/> The probe usually traces along a straight line on a flat surface or in a circular arc around a cylindrical surface. The length of the path that it traces is called the ''measurement length''. The wavelength of the lowest frequency filter that will be used to analyze the data is usually defined as the ''sampling length''. Most standards recommend that the measurement length should be at least seven times longer than the sampling length, and according to the [[Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem]] it should be at least ten times longer than the wavelength{{Citation needed|date=October 2009}} of interesting features. The ''assessment length'' or ''evaluation length'' is the length of data that will be used for analysis. Commonly one sampling length is discarded from each end of the measurement length. 3D measurements can be made with a profilometer by scanning over a 2D area on the surface.
The most common method is to use a [[diamond]] stylus [[profilometer]]. The stylus is run perpendicular to the lay of the surface.<ref name="degarmo223"/> The probe usually traces along a straight line on a flat surface or in a circular arc around a cylindrical surface. The length of the path that it traces is called the ''measurement length''. The wavelength of the lowest frequency filter that will be used to analyze the data is usually defined as the ''sampling length''. Most standards recommend that the measurement length should be at least seven times longer than the sampling length, and according to the [[Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem]] it should be at least two times longer than the wavelength{{Citation needed|date=October 2009}} of interesting features. The ''assessment length'' or ''evaluation length'' is the length of data that will be used for analysis. Commonly one sampling length is discarded from each end of the measurement length. 3D measurements can be made with a profilometer by scanning over a 2D area on the surface.


The disadvantage of a profilometer is that it is not accurate when the size of the features of the surface are close to the same size as the stylus. Another disadvantage is that profilometers have difficulty detecting flaws of the same general size as the roughness of the surface.<ref>{{harvnb|Degarmo|Black|Kohser|2003|p=224}}.</ref> There are also limitations for non-contact instruments. For example, instruments that rely on optical interference cannot resolve features that are less than some fraction of the operating wavelength. This limitation can make it difficult to accurately measure roughness even on common objects, since the interesting features may be well below the wavelength of light. The wavelength of red light is about 650&nbsp;nm,<ref>{{cite web |url= http://science-edu.larc.nasa.gov/EDDOCS/Wavelengths_for_Colors.html|title= What Wavelength Goes With a Color?|accessdate=2008-05-14 }}</ref> while the average roughness, (R<sub>a</sub>) of a ground shaft might be 2000&nbsp;nm.
The disadvantage of a profilometer is that it is not accurate when the size of the features of the surface are close to the same size as the stylus. Another disadvantage is that profilometers have difficulty detecting flaws of the same general size as the roughness of the surface.<ref>{{harvnb|Degarmo|Black|Kohser|2003|p=224}}.</ref> There are also limitations for non-contact instruments. For example, instruments that rely on optical interference cannot resolve features that are less than some fraction of the operating wavelength. This limitation can make it difficult to accurately measure roughness even on common objects, since the interesting features may be well below the wavelength of light. The wavelength of red light is about 650&nbsp;nm,<ref>{{cite web |url= http://science-edu.larc.nasa.gov/EDDOCS/Wavelengths_for_Colors.html|title= What Wavelength Goes With a Color?|accessdate=2008-05-14 }}</ref> while the average roughness, (R<sub>a</sub>) of a ground shaft might be 2000&nbsp;nm.

Revision as of 16:22, 2 May 2014

Surface finish, also known as surface texture, is the characteristics of a surface. It has three components: lay, surface roughness, and waviness.[1]

Lay

Examples of various lay patterns

Lay is the direction of the predominant surface pattern ordinarily determined by the production method used.

Surface roughness

Surface roughness commonly shortened to roughness, is a measure of the finely spaced surface irregularities.[1] In engineering, this is what is usually meant by "surface finish".

Waviness

Waviness is the measure of surface irregularities with a spacing greater than that of surface roughness. These usually occur due to warping, vibrations, or deflection during machining.[1]

Measurement

How a profilometer works

Surface finish may be measured in two ways: contact and non-contact methods. Contact methods involve dragging a measurement stylus across the surface; these instruments are called profilometers. Non-contact methods include: interferometry, confocal microscopy, focus variation, structured light, electrical capacitance, electron microscopy, and photogrammetry.

The most common method is to use a diamond stylus profilometer. The stylus is run perpendicular to the lay of the surface.[1] The probe usually traces along a straight line on a flat surface or in a circular arc around a cylindrical surface. The length of the path that it traces is called the measurement length. The wavelength of the lowest frequency filter that will be used to analyze the data is usually defined as the sampling length. Most standards recommend that the measurement length should be at least seven times longer than the sampling length, and according to the Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem it should be at least two times longer than the wavelength[citation needed] of interesting features. The assessment length or evaluation length is the length of data that will be used for analysis. Commonly one sampling length is discarded from each end of the measurement length. 3D measurements can be made with a profilometer by scanning over a 2D area on the surface.

The disadvantage of a profilometer is that it is not accurate when the size of the features of the surface are close to the same size as the stylus. Another disadvantage is that profilometers have difficulty detecting flaws of the same general size as the roughness of the surface.[2] There are also limitations for non-contact instruments. For example, instruments that rely on optical interference cannot resolve features that are less than some fraction of the operating wavelength. This limitation can make it difficult to accurately measure roughness even on common objects, since the interesting features may be well below the wavelength of light. The wavelength of red light is about 650 nm,[3] while the average roughness, (Ra) of a ground shaft might be 2000 nm.

The first step of analysis is to filter the raw data to remove very high frequency data (called "micro-roughness") since it can often be attributed to vibrations or debris on the surface. Filtering out the micro-roughness at a given cut-off threshold also allows to bring closer the roughness assessment made using profilometers having different stylus ball radius e.g. 2µm and 5µm radii. Next, the data is separated into roughness, waviness and form. This can be accomplished using reference lines, envelope methods, digital filters, fractals or other techniques. Finally, the data is summarized using one or more roughness parameters, or a graph. In the past, surface finish was usually analyzed by hand. The roughness trace would be plotted on graph paper, and an experienced machinist decided what data to ignore and where to place the mean line. Today, the measured data is stored on a computer, and analyzed using methods from signal analysis and statistics.[4]

Specification

In the United States, surface finish is usually specified using the ASME Y14.36M standard. The other common standard is International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 1302.

Manufacturing

Many factors contribute to the surface finish in manufacturing. In forming processes, such as molding or metal forming, surface finish of the die determines the surface finish of the workpiece. In machining the interaction of the cutting edges and the microstructure of the material being cut both contribute to the final surface finish.[citation needed] In general, the cost of manufacturing a surface increases as the surface finish improves.[5]

Just as different manufacturing processes produce parts at various tolerances, they are also capable of different roughnesses. Generally these two characteristics are linked: manufacturing processes that are dimensionally precise create surfaces with low roughness. In other words, if a process can manufacture parts to a narrow dimensional tolerance, the parts will not be very rough.

Due to the abstractness of surface finish parameters, engineers usually use a tool that has a variety of surface roughnesses created using different manufacturing methods.[5]

References

  1. ^ a b c d Degarmo, Black & Kohser 2003, p. 223.
  2. ^ Degarmo, Black & Kohser 2003, p. 224.
  3. ^ "What Wavelength Goes With a Color?". Retrieved 2008-05-14.
  4. ^ Whitehouse, DJ. (1994). Handbook of Surface Metrology, Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing. ISBN 0-7503-0039-6
  5. ^ a b Degarmo, Black & Kohser 2003, p. 227.

Bibliography

  • Degarmo, E. Paul; Black, J T.; Kohser, Ronald A. (2003), Materials and Processes in Manufacturing (9th ed.), Wiley, ISBN 0-471-65653-4.

Further reading

  • Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, Section 13.5 "Surface Texture Designation, Production, and Control" by Thomas W. Wolf.