Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Marge6914 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject Human Computer Interaction}}
{{WikiProject Human Computer Interaction}}

== Project Page Improvements List ==

Here is the start of a list of suggested ways to improve our Project page. If you are interested in tackling one of these tasks insert your username next to that task.

# Add a resources bar similar to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics]]
# Create or add relevant images to the page.[[User:Maee10|Maee10]] ([[User talk:Maee10|talk]]) 05:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
# Add an article assessment bot.
# Move the "articles needing improvement" section to its own page. [[User:Trejoh|Trejoh]] ([[User talk:Trejoh|talk]]) 00:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
# Improve the structure for "articles needing improvements".
# Create a table under Ongoing Tasks with What/Where headings (See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science]]) [[User:JLand13|JLand13]] ([[User talk:JLand13|talk]]) 00:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
#: Create a high priority tasks list under Ongoing Tasks.
# Create article alerts section [[User:DDS6619|DDS6619]] ([[User talk:DDS6619|talk]])
# Redesign the layout of the Project page.
# Create a quick links top bar. [[User:DDS6619|DDS6619]] ([[User talk:DDS6619|talk]])
# Proofread all content on the Project page and related pages and fix typos and such. [[User:Marge6914|Marge6914]] ([[User talk:Marge6914|talk]]) 23:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Trejoh|Trejoh]] ([[User talk:Trejoh|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trejoh|contribs]]) 00:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==Organizing HCI-related Topics==
==Organizing HCI-related Topics==
Line 116: Line 134:


::: I like the new logo too! I agree at small sizes it may be a little squished, it's definitely more visually distinct than the original image. [[User:Md gilbert|Md gilbert]] ([[User talk:Md gilbert|talk]]) 00:46, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
::: I like the new logo too! I agree at small sizes it may be a little squished, it's definitely more visually distinct than the original image. [[User:Md gilbert|Md gilbert]] ([[User talk:Md gilbert|talk]]) 00:46, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

== Project Page Improvements List ==

Here is the start of a list of suggested ways to improve our Project page. If you are interested in tackling one of these tasks insert your username next to that task.

# Add a resources bar similar to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics]]
# Create or add relevant images to the page.[[User:Maee10|Maee10]] ([[User talk:Maee10|talk]]) 05:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
# Add an article assessment bot.
# Move the "articles needing improvement" section to its own page. [[User:Trejoh|Trejoh]] ([[User talk:Trejoh|talk]]) 00:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
# Improve the structure for "articles needing improvements".
# Create a table under Ongoing Tasks with What/Where headings (See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science]]) [[User:JLand13|JLand13]] ([[User talk:JLand13|talk]]) 00:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
#: Create a high priority tasks list under Ongoing Tasks.
# Create article alerts section [[User:DDS6619|DDS6619]] ([[User talk:DDS6619|talk]])
# Redesign the layout of the Project page.
# Create a quick links top bar. [[User:DDS6619|DDS6619]] ([[User talk:DDS6619|talk]])
# Proofread all content on the Project page and related pages and fix typos and such. [[User:Marge6914|Marge6914]] ([[User talk:Marge6914|talk]]) 23:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Trejoh|Trejoh]] ([[User talk:Trejoh|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trejoh|contribs]]) 00:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 23:19, 7 May 2014

WikiProject iconHuman–Computer Interaction Unassessed (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Project Page Improvements List

Here is the start of a list of suggested ways to improve our Project page. If you are interested in tackling one of these tasks insert your username next to that task.

  1. Add a resources bar similar to Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics
  2. Create or add relevant images to the page.Maee10 (talk) 05:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Add an article assessment bot.
  4. Move the "articles needing improvement" section to its own page. Trejoh (talk) 00:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Improve the structure for "articles needing improvements".
  6. Create a table under Ongoing Tasks with What/Where headings (See Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science) JLand13 (talk) 00:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Create a high priority tasks list under Ongoing Tasks.
  7. Create article alerts section DDS6619 (talk)
  8. Redesign the layout of the Project page.
  9. Create a quick links top bar. DDS6619 (talk)
  10. Proofread all content on the Project page and related pages and fix typos and such. Marge6914 (talk) 23:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trejoh (talkcontribs) 00:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply] 

Here is an initial attempt to sort out hci--related topics into categories. Figuring out an agreeable arrangement of these categories may be useful to the project. This initial cut needs lots of help.

Theory

  • actor-network theory
  • activity theory
  • embodied interaction
  • distributed cognition
  • situated action
  • grounded theory
  • ethnography
  • ecological psychology

Research

  • qualitative research
  • quantitative research
  • user interviews
  • fieldwork
  • ethics

People

  • human factors
  • social media
  • technical writing
  • networking with people
  • communities
  • computer-supported cooperative work
  • product management
  • organizations
  • consumer appeal
  • user experience
  • stakeholders
  • collaboration

Data

  • data management
  • data analysis
  • database design
  • input methods
  • documentation

Security

  • privacy
  • network security

Applications

  • wearable technologies
  • robotics
  • electronic money
  • science
  • engineering
  • computer science
  • internet
  • computers
  • new tools
  • standards
  • automobiles
  • aviation
  • rehabilitation
  • profitability

Visual Design

  • user interaction
  • interaction design
  • entertainment
  • culture
  • web design
  • art
  • psychology
  • aesthetics
  • design

User Centered Design

  • user perception
  • user research
  • user values
  • iterative design
  • card sorts
  • ideation
  • developer values
  • surveys
  • prototyping
  • invention
  • design process
  • visual design

Standards

  • constraints
  • usability
  • productivity
  • cognition
  • testing
  • technology
  • information architecture
  • interfaces
  • accessibility
  • simplicity
  • efficiency
  • affordances

I think it might be nice if we had another user badge to choose from for the project. Does anyone with more design chops than I have want to try and create another image/template for the project? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Md gilbert (talkcontribs) 16:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can give it a try. If others also have logo ideas, perhaps we can have a little contest :) - J-Mo Talk to Me Email Me 21:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I pulled something together. What do you think? - J-Mo Talk to Me Email Me 02:06, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I like it very much! :-) It shows all the relevant concepts (the human, the computer, and the interaction) in a simple way. That's hard to achieve, good work.
The "computer" part is a little too complex for small sizes. It's hard to distinguish it when scaled down to a thumbnail (which could be useful at user boxes, for example); it has an uncomfortable "squeezing a bug" feeling in it. :-/
Could you try something to reduce complexity, maybe a "simple" version of the logo for small sizes, maybe using bigger circles and only one connector at each size?
I like the new logo too! I agree at small sizes it may be a little squished, it's definitely more visually distinct than the original image. Md gilbert (talk) 00:46, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]