User talk:Wtshymanski: Difference between revisions
Wtshymanski (talk | contribs) articles are about their subjects |
Adding a new section:About the extended diode biasing |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Thanks.[[Special:Contributions/132.68.245.117|132.68.245.117]] ([[User talk:132.68.245.117|talk]]) 06:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks.[[Special:Contributions/132.68.245.117|132.68.245.117]] ([[User talk:132.68.245.117|talk]]) 06:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Articles are about their subjects. Circuit theorists can come up with any arbitrary property they like for an element, but such theoretical concepts are too off-topic and confusing for a general purpose encyclopedia. --[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski#top|talk]]) 13:48, 24 August 2014 (UTC) |
:Articles are about their subjects. Circuit theorists can come up with any arbitrary property they like for an element, but such theoretical concepts are too off-topic and confusing for a general purpose encyclopedia. --[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski#top|talk]]) 13:48, 24 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
== About the extended diode biasing == |
|||
Wtshymanski, |
|||
IMO Thingmaker and SpinningSpark are right in [[Talk:Diode logic|Diode logic talk page]]. It seems the extended biasing (+12V instead +6V and -6V instead 0V) solves sooner the problems introduced by the relatively high pull-up and pull-down resistors than by the non-ideal diodes. [[User:Circuit dreamer|Circuit dreamer]] ([[User talk:Circuit dreamer|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Circuit dreamer|contribs]], [[Special:EmailUser/Circuit dreamer|email]]) 14:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:20, 24 August 2014
This is a user talk page.
Hello,
I see that you removed my entry on loss-free resistors (twice!) but I don't understand why.
You wrote a comment that it is a "circuit theory gimmick", though the entry includes references to well cited papers that show real applications and implementations of this. In addition, Loss Free Resistors are taught at universities world-wide and are discussed at length at the standard textbook on the subject, which is also cited.
It seems to me that this is a valid encyclopedic entry on Wikipedia, and shouldn't be removed.
Thanks.132.68.245.117 (talk) 06:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Articles are about their subjects. Circuit theorists can come up with any arbitrary property they like for an element, but such theoretical concepts are too off-topic and confusing for a general purpose encyclopedia. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:48, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
About the extended diode biasing
Wtshymanski,
IMO Thingmaker and SpinningSpark are right in Diode logic talk page. It seems the extended biasing (+12V instead +6V and -6V instead 0V) solves sooner the problems introduced by the relatively high pull-up and pull-down resistors than by the non-ideal diodes. Circuit dreamer (talk, contribs, email) 14:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)