User talk:Wtshymanski: Difference between revisions
Adding a new section:About the extended diode biasing |
→About the extended diode biasing: About the problems introduced by real diodes |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Wtshymanski, |
Wtshymanski, |
||
IMO Thingmaker and SpinningSpark are right in [[Talk:Diode logic|Diode logic talk page]]. It seems the extended biasing (+12V instead +6V and -6V instead 0V) solves sooner the problems introduced by the relatively high pull-up and pull-down resistors than by the non-ideal diodes. |
IMO Thingmaker and SpinningSpark are right in [[Talk:Diode logic|Diode logic talk page]]. It seems the extended biasing (+12V instead +6V and -6V instead 0V) solves sooner the problems introduced by the relatively high pull-up and pull-down resistors than by the non-ideal diodes. |
||
But real diodes can cause some interesting effects as follows. Thus, if we cascade a few diode ANDs, the ''logical 1'' voltage will continuously increase above the nominal +6V voltage (+6.7V -> +7.4V -> 8.1V... for Si diodes); if we cascade a few diode ORs, the ''logical 0'' voltage will continuously decrease below the nominal 0V (-0.7V -> -1.4V -> -2.1V...) [[User:Circuit dreamer|Circuit dreamer]] ([[User talk:Circuit dreamer|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Circuit dreamer|contribs]], [[Special:EmailUser/Circuit dreamer|email]]) 14:31, 24 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:31, 24 August 2014
This is a user talk page.
Hello,
I see that you removed my entry on loss-free resistors (twice!) but I don't understand why.
You wrote a comment that it is a "circuit theory gimmick", though the entry includes references to well cited papers that show real applications and implementations of this. In addition, Loss Free Resistors are taught at universities world-wide and are discussed at length at the standard textbook on the subject, which is also cited.
It seems to me that this is a valid encyclopedic entry on Wikipedia, and shouldn't be removed.
Thanks.132.68.245.117 (talk) 06:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Articles are about their subjects. Circuit theorists can come up with any arbitrary property they like for an element, but such theoretical concepts are too off-topic and confusing for a general purpose encyclopedia. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:48, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
About the extended diode biasing
Wtshymanski,
IMO Thingmaker and SpinningSpark are right in Diode logic talk page. It seems the extended biasing (+12V instead +6V and -6V instead 0V) solves sooner the problems introduced by the relatively high pull-up and pull-down resistors than by the non-ideal diodes.
But real diodes can cause some interesting effects as follows. Thus, if we cascade a few diode ANDs, the logical 1 voltage will continuously increase above the nominal +6V voltage (+6.7V -> +7.4V -> 8.1V... for Si diodes); if we cascade a few diode ORs, the logical 0 voltage will continuously decrease below the nominal 0V (-0.7V -> -1.4V -> -2.1V...) Circuit dreamer (talk, contribs, email) 14:31, 24 August 2014 (UTC)