Talk:Canadian response to Omar Khadr

Questionable source "thefacesbehind.net"

This source was used in the article and i have substituted it with a {cn} tag because it does not meet basic requirements of WP:RS. It is not clear: Who is the author? Does the author and publisher have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy? Who is the publisher? Who owns the website?... IQinn (talk) 01:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

You're right it doesn't appear to fit the RS guidelines, but I hate to forget it.

Check this out:

"Like the children of Canadian diplomats, he simply had a father whose work took the family overseas for long stretches of time."

That's truly precious.

The subject of this article isn't so much Omar Khadr as it is about the people who support or oppose him. It would be good if we could find a real RS that discusses the people who run that site, and the people who claim to believe it.

-- Randy2063 (talk) 05:05, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Toronto Sun

The entire paper is a sensationalist tabloid, and the editorial section is even worse. You might as well post a blog. 99.236.221.124 (talk) 21:35, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Outdated

I've tagged this page {{outdated}} as it claims nothing has been done to repatriate Omar Khadr. He was repatriated to Millhaven Institution on September 29, 2012 so that much is outdated. The rest of this is still valid. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 21:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Should Wikipedia be a place for propaganda?

"For several years following Khadr's capture in 2002, his case did not generate any "serious controversy" "Backed" by a source published in 2003! Gatorinvancouver (talk) 01:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC)